Claim: Major policy decisions should always be left to politicians and other government experts.
Reason: Politicians and other government experts are more informed and thus have better judgment and perspective than do members of the general public.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which that claim is based.
The author claims that only governors should make the decision for society. The writer further reasons that information and knowledge of politicians give them decent outlook toward the conditions, which ordinary people do not possess. I fundamentally do not concur with this disposition. In what follows, I will list my cogent arguments to cast doubt on the accuracy of this claim and its clue.
The first crucial fact which should be considered is the replacement of the democratic society instead of the aristocratic society, where people were ordered by the priority based on their position and properties. However, at the modern democratic society, the system is by the people, of the people, and for the people; indeed, the governor is elected through the public, he belongs the same nation and its national and he and his activities are for the same society. At this interrelated cycle, how it is possible to underestimate or ignore the crux factor which is public? While this system is shaped and rooted in public, there should be an interchangeable and consistent link between the politicians and citizens until the base fundament of the system could be supported appropriately.
Another striking factor which should be considered is the shortage of political knowledge for handling the wide variety of issues in society. Actually, there is a broad range of issues which a nation could face; in addition, answers to these problems are beyond the political knowledge of the governors. A lucid example which could clarify this argument with more details is the appearance of contagious disease in society. In this case, is the leader’s political information helpful for halting its contagious and fatal consequences?! Of course not. At this case, a group of publics from medicine field whose ideas is ignored in this prompt should be considered for making an ultimate decision and rescue the majority of society from the mortality.
Finally, the writer for the clarification of his claim reasons that the profound knowledge of ruler gains him a better perspective toward the issue. From my perspective, this adhesive clue is a shaky one since the author overlooks the importance of the contribution of different thought. In fact, the better decision shapes according to the consideration of issue from the various direction, and this occurs when there are the exchange and contribution of thought. Thus, solo deep knowledge can not present a perfect outcome. I prefer to give an example of this argument to give more sense to this argument. There was a traffic jam in one of the streets in my hometown which is the main access and located in the center of the city. The mayor of Tabriz decided to build a flyover in that region to reduce the load of traffic and its consequence air and sound pollution. While at the first glance this decision sounds like the wise and effective option, during its construction process lots of buildings near the construction site were demolished for preparing the required base for the construction. This apparently suitable option ends to homelessness of some poor people in that region.
To wrap it up, all the aforementioned arguments illustrate my attitude toward this claim and its reason. I do not agree with this prompt as it stands on the shaky reason.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 755, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...majority of society from the mortality. Finally, the writer for the clarificatio...
^^^
Line 5, column 171, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rompt as it stands on the shaky reason.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, apparently, but, finally, first, however, if, look, may, so, thus, while, in addition, in fact, of course
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 19.5258426966 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 14.8657303371 135% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 46.0 33.0505617978 139% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 79.0 58.6224719101 135% => OK
Nominalization: 22.0 12.9106741573 170% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2764.0 2235.4752809 124% => OK
No of words: 545.0 442.535393258 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07155963303 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.83169070408 4.55969084622 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86107591787 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 267.0 215.323595506 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.489908256881 0.4932671777 99% => OK
syllable_count: 865.8 704.065955056 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 10.0 4.99550561798 200% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 12.0 4.38483146067 274% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.5855438484 60.3974514979 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.166666667 118.986275619 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7083333333 23.4991977007 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.79166666667 5.21951772744 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 5.13820224719 214% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.125793980798 0.243740707755 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0393334426665 0.0831039109588 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0351445800223 0.0758088955206 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0830476688162 0.150359130593 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0267988526499 0.0667264976115 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 14.1392134831 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.1639044944 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.81 8.38706741573 105% => OK
difficult_words: 141.0 100.480337079 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.