tpo37-integrated
Both reading and listening parts offer two opposing views on the efficacy of the turtle excluder device (TED). While the passage presents three drawbacks of this system, the lecturer discussed some clues to cast doubt on the accuracy of those drawbacks and call them in questions.
First of all, the text referred to the probability of capturing turtle, which is rare, and the usage of TED cast to lose of a certain percent of shrimp from the net which is not cost-effective. However, the professor casts doubt on the validity of this assertion. While the professor accepts rarely turtles are captured by shrimpers, the amount of shrimper in the sea is high which put turtles in danger. As she explains, yearly the thousands of shrimp-fishing boats are float in the sea, if annually each boat catches one turtle, the number of captured turtles will be more than a thousand. Therefore, this low probability cannot verify to not use the TED.
Secondly, the passage posits that there is an alternative option such as the limited duration of net underwater, which is more effective than the TED. On the contrary, the instructor refutes the accuracy of this alternative too. As she said, it is an arduous task to monitor the shrimpers netting duration, since most of the boats are far away from the coast and controlling system cannot keep the duration of those boats. On the other hand, the checking the TED is more convenient and easier, as the controller just check the boat possesses a TED before it goes in the sea. Consequently, this purposed method is not as effective as the TED.
Finally, Meanwhile the article, by referring to some huge turtles which are bigger than TED's hole, makes TED's efficacy shaky, the lecturer, on the other hand, rejects this claim too. As she claims the opening of TED is arrangeable and shrimpers can easily modify its size without altering its function. Thus, the shrimper can avoid capturing the big turtles by enlarging the TED opening.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 285, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[9]
Message: The adverb 'rarely' is usually put before the verb 'accepts'.
Suggestion: rarely accepts
... of this assertion. While the professor accepts rarely turtles are captured by shrimpers, the ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, finally, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, while, such as, first of all, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 12.0772626932 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 22.412803532 76% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 30.3222958057 139% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1649.0 1373.03311258 120% => OK
No of words: 336.0 270.72406181 124% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90773809524 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28139028586 4.04702891845 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62874119265 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 145.348785872 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.532738095238 0.540411800872 99% => OK
syllable_count: 502.2 419.366225166 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 1.25165562914 639% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.4775268475 49.2860985944 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.933333333 110.228320801 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4 21.698381199 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.73333333333 7.06452816374 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.3589403974 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 53.8541721854 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.2367328918 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.72 8.42419426049 104% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 63.6247240618 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.