1. Governments should place few, if any, restrictions on scientific research and development.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
The author of the prompt adduces that there should not be any restriction by the governors for the scientific activities. This is the claim with which I partially do concur. Among the countless reasons which give adherence to my viewpoint; I will list the most conspicuous ones in the following paragraphs, to rear my standpoint.
The first striking point which should be considered is the flourished basement that the free environment provides for explorations. In fact, it is obvious that the free circumstance does not possess any burden on the human being; therefore, he has the limitless mind which could explore in any area. According to noteworthy novel research conducted by the Psychology Department of Tehran University, the mind is fifty-five percent more creative in the limitless area rather than the banned realm. Based on this research, while there is no limit and barrier, the mind puts entire its concentration on the topic; consequently, its outcome is more efficient. This research lucidly explains, the impact of rules implemented by the governor which could narrow downed the inventors’ focus area and reduces the proficiency of the outcome form conducted research.
Another equal crux point which should be considered is the leaders possess the lack of familiarity with the scientific topics. In another word, the governors are dominant in the field of politics which is far away from the scientific activities. Thus, any rule or ban which is defined by the governor is a foreigner in the realm of science and its activities. Consequently, this shabby and weak rule appointed based on fragile understanding, will not fit with the real scientific environment; in addition, it is an annoying factor which prevents the exploration of scientists.
However, what is discussed in the two abovementioned paragraphs, should not be overgeneralized. The fact that any scientific activity should be fitted into human rights never and ever should be underestimated by the inventors. Besides, this prevention is possible the conducted laws by the governors. Indeed, the chasm creativity and intelligence of the human brain pave the paths for any types of exploration some of which can be harmful to mankind. An instance of this harmful finding is the nuclear weapon. Actually, at the beginning phase, the nuclear energy was a great option for the energy sources which could be an alternative option for the fossil fuels; on the other hand, with endless thought of human beings it converted to a nuclear weapon and it ended with the fatal outcomes in the Nagasaki and Hiroshima. This example comprehensively depicts the importance of controlling over scientific activities.
To wrap it up, based on the all aforementioned facts, there should be a control over the scientific activities; however, it should not be a restriction over the activities and it should be according to the awareness from the field of science.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 243, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he awareness from the field of science.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, besides, consequently, first, however, if, so, therefore, thus, while, in addition, in fact, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 28.0 19.5258426966 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 33.0505617978 79% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 58.6224719101 99% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 12.9106741573 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2466.0 2235.4752809 110% => OK
No of words: 471.0 442.535393258 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23566878981 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.65859790218 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07836151372 2.79657885939 110% => OK
Unique words: 234.0 215.323595506 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.496815286624 0.4932671777 101% => OK
syllable_count: 753.3 704.065955056 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 6.24550561798 176% => OK
Article: 10.0 4.99550561798 200% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.38483146067 228% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.5797690951 60.3974514979 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.3 118.986275619 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.55 23.4991977007 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.21951772744 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.178413064111 0.243740707755 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0606580605833 0.0831039109588 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0343236016368 0.0758088955206 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112255951132 0.150359130593 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0293969987189 0.0667264976115 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 14.1392134831 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 48.8420337079 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.41 12.1639044944 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.27 8.38706741573 111% => OK
difficult_words: 134.0 100.480337079 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 62.5 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.