Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long. use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

Essay topics:

Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long. use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

    Different factors have a role in the workers' sense of satisfaction from their occupation. One of these factors is the type of task and responsibility they get. While some people believe that the alteration of their activities' type during their working hours is more appealing; on the other hand, another group thinks differently. I generally do concur with the first group, among the countless reasons which advocate my standpoint, I would delve into most conspicuous ones in what follows.
    First of all, a striking reason which should be considered is human being's instinctive of variation seeking. Indeed, according to the history individual wish to stand in a consistent situation, and looks for the alteration of position. The same situation is applied in the working condition. An employee, according to his inner wish, eager to do different types of task during his working hours instead of focusing on solo one specific issue. A lucid example which shed the spotlight on this claim is my own instance. I am an employee in an architectural-design office, at my first days in the office, since I was new-comer, I was only responsible for doing the AutoCAD drawing; which was a routine and boring condition. After a month, as I did not satisfy with my job, I asked my boss to allocate other duties, since the repetition of the identical pattern was boring for me. After that time, my duties got varied according to the daily demand of office, while one day I visit the site for measuring it, the other day I do design and drawing the plans. This novel schedule motivates me to work harder, since appetites my inherence of variation seeking.
   Another equally crucial reason which should hold in mind, the variation of tasks causes to the enhancement of works accuracy. An individual after a while, when tasks get a repetition pattern, overlooks some errors during the progression of those tasks. The same fact applies to the working condition, if a manager wishes to have a high-accurate outcome from his workers' attempts, he should provide the shift of tasks between the employees to prevent the possible mistake done for the sake of repetition. This fact is also verified by an intelligence, noteworthy survey conducted in the Psychology Department of Tehran University in Iran. According to this study, by the change of routine in daily life, mankind awareness increases with approximate fifty-five percent, which prevents the possible erring done during the duplicated task.
    However, there is the belief that repeating the same issue makes the worker expert on that field, and shift of duties prevent this situation. Besides, it could lead to missing the economical profits from the company too. Although with the alteration of takes, since the worker is stranger with the task, there will be some error in the initial phase of work, as time goes on, the worker will get used to the condition and get skillful on it. Consequently, the entire company in which workers experience these shifts will get highly-skilled workers in multi areas. Therefore, it could make more profit while its workers are satisfied with their work.
    To wrap it up, all the aforementioned reasons explicitly depict the importance of shifting the tasks during the working hours. As the workers are variety seeking, the accuracy of work inclines; furthermore, the company makes more profits from this way.
 

Votes
Average: 9 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, consequently, first, furthermore, however, if, look, so, therefore, while, first of all, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 46.0 43.0788530466 107% => OK
Preposition: 87.0 52.1666666667 167% => OK
Nominalization: 26.0 8.0752688172 322% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2953.0 1977.66487455 149% => OK
No of words: 561.0 407.700716846 138% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26381461676 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.86676880123 4.48103885553 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.60284435958 2.67179642975 135% => OK
Unique words: 296.0 212.727598566 139% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.527629233512 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 889.2 618.680645161 144% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 12.0 3.08781362007 389% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 14.0 3.51792114695 398% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 14.0 4.94265232975 283% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6003584229 121% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.3753691278 48.9658058833 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.12 100.406767564 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.44 20.6045352989 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.84 5.45110844103 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.184652168047 0.236089414692 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0530669264828 0.076458572812 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0452951831924 0.0737576698707 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111012563704 0.150856017488 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0227839099147 0.0645574589148 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 11.7677419355 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 10.9000537634 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.95 8.01818996416 112% => OK
difficult_words: 150.0 86.8835125448 173% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.

Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.