1.In any field of inquiry, the beginner is more likely than the expert to make important contributions.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take.

Essay topics:

1. In any field of inquiry, the beginner is more likely than the expert to make important contributions.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.

The author asserts that the portion of contribution by the novices is bigger than the experts in any area of demand. This is the claim with which I partially do not concur. Among the countless reasons which give adherence to my viewpoint, I will list the most conspicuous ones in the following paragraphs to rear my standpoint.
The first striking fact which should be considered is the role of knowledge on the effectiveness of any contribution. Indeed, no matter what is the affair, as long as the effort and contributions have been done based on the knowledge and cognition, its effectiveness will be warranted. In addition, the impact of practice over understating over the issue is an undeniable fact. Therefore, the perception and cognition of an expert over his field of specialty are higher than a beginner with insufficient background about the topic. This fact also is concretely supported by the newly released data by the Sociology Department in Tehran University, according to this refreshing intelligence conducted research, knowledge over the issue is increased by approximate of fifty-five percent, in the case the theoretical data is accompanied with the pragmatic learning. Thus, as the specialist possesses a comprehensive understanding of the issue rather than the beginner; his contribution is also will be more efficient.
Another equal crux fact which gives a booster to my perspective that the expert’s contribution is more than the freshman’s is the chance of the making mistake by these two groups. It is explicitly obvious that the ratio of making mistake and failure of freshman is higher than a specialist. The crucial fact which should not be underestimated is the years of experiences that the expert has earned during his working period. The contribution of these experiences with the previously mentioned knowledge leads any step taken by an expert, no matter how small it is, possesses a high chance of success in comparison of the contribution done by the freshman. Therefore, the long period of familiarity with the topic and learned lessons from previous experiences paves the path for the errorless contribution of the specialist in his era of specialty.
However, what is mentioned in the two previous paragraphs should no overshadow the impact of novel perspective which proposed by the newcomers. Indeed, as the expert spends the long period over the issue he gets used to the field and by the time he misses his curious and creative attitude toward the issue. On the other hand, since the freshman takes his initial step toward the issue, he possesses more eager and enthusiasm toward the topic, all these eagerness and enthusiasm lead the novice present novel idea and perspectives toward the issue. From my perspective, this creativity and freshness will be more effective if are combined with the expert’s knowledge and experiences. Therefore, it requires the company of expert and freshman.
To wrap it up, all the aforementioned reasons shows the contribution of the experts is more than the novice in any field.

Votes
Average: 6.6 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 449, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this eagerness' or 'these eagernesses'?
Suggestion: this eagerness; these eagernesses
...er and enthusiasm toward the topic, all these eagerness and enthusiasm lead the novice present ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 122, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s is more than the novice in any field.
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, so, therefore, thus, in addition, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 19.5258426966 128% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 33.0505617978 94% => OK
Preposition: 71.0 58.6224719101 121% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 12.9106741573 124% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2584.0 2235.4752809 116% => OK
No of words: 497.0 442.535393258 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19919517103 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.72159896747 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10871507297 2.79657885939 111% => OK
Unique words: 230.0 215.323595506 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.46277665996 0.4932671777 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 804.6 704.065955056 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.8752575752 60.3974514979 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.2 118.986275619 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.85 23.4991977007 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.1 5.21951772744 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.164400319674 0.243740707755 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0585679775478 0.0831039109588 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0389541939058 0.0758088955206 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113017126377 0.150359130593 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0318457951049 0.0667264976115 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 14.1392134831 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 48.8420337079 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.18 12.1639044944 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.96 8.38706741573 107% => OK
difficult_words: 130.0 100.480337079 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.