In any field of inquiry, the beginner is more likely than the expert to make important contributions.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Can it be said that the beginner is more likely than the expert to make important contribution in any field of inquiry ?
It has been mostly observed that the beginner often times has tendencies to make important contribution to a field.
In Universities for instance, younger professors often times have been known to make significant contribution to research and student welfare been that they are readily available and are equipped with the latest advances in the field. They mostly are not distracted by administrative position like the older professors so they then to have time for their research and students.
Although, it can be said that the expert has attained a consummate and would be less likely to make mistakes the beginner would and will be better equipped to deal with the arduousness of the field, he/she might more overwhelmed by the glory of his summit.
Moreover, the beginners in most fields are inquisitive and want to learn and so doing push themselves into understanding and by so doing so could develop into an experts after going through the process of making important contribution to the field of inquiry as seen in the lives of great prodigee like Frank lod wrights the apprentice and later renowned Architect, artist and Builder.
Furthermore, in most fields of inquiry, there are levels, ranks and aspirations to defined success and beginners mostly aspire to be there so there is the zeal that pushes the beginner to always be on his/her toes to always meets specific target such that they are often make contribution to the body since that is a mean to recognition.
Ultimately, it is clear that the beginner is more likely to make more to make important contribution to a field of inquiry since they are at the nadir and aspire to be at the zenith of their field and it is such aspiration that galvanize them.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 55, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...an be said that the expert has attained a consummate and would be less likely to make mistak...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 160, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'an expert' or simply 'experts'?
Suggestion: an expert; experts
...g and by so doing so could develop into an experts after going through the process of maki...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 313, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e lives of great prodigee like Frank lod wrights the apprentice and later renowne...
^^
Line 15, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... such aspiration that galvanize them.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, moreover, so, then, for instance, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 19.5258426966 118% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 33.0505617978 85% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 58.6224719101 87% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1551.0 2235.4752809 69% => OK
No of words: 315.0 442.535393258 71% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92380952381 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21286593061 4.55969084622 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76625000321 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 215.323595506 68% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.463492063492 0.4932671777 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 486.0 704.065955056 69% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 20.2370786517 40% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 39.0 23.0359550562 169% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 93.3467159304 60.3974514979 155% => OK
Chars per sentence: 193.875 118.986275619 163% => OK
Words per sentence: 39.375 23.4991977007 168% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.875 5.21951772744 151% => OK
Paragraphs: 7.0 4.97078651685 141% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 5.13820224719 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.194803351132 0.243740707755 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111013804709 0.0831039109588 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.060302325167 0.0758088955206 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120134900427 0.150359130593 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0597067995235 0.0667264976115 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 21.4 14.1392134831 151% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.35 48.8420337079 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.3 12.1743820225 142% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.85 12.1639044944 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.73 8.38706741573 104% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 100.480337079 63% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.8971910112 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 17.6 11.2143820225 157% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 11.7820224719 153% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum six paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.