Educational institutions should dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed.
Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider the possible consequences of implementing the policy and explain how these consequences shape your position.
Would it be said to be a wise decision to pursue a field in which there is a low chance of success ?
While it is clear that education in it’s self is the bedrock of any country as it is the breeding point of people to consummate ingenuity for the benefit of humanity, it could also have negative effects if not well thought out.
Firstly, it should be a moral duty of educational institutions to counsel and advice the leaders they hope to build and a good way to start is by directing them on the current trends in the world and profession so as to help them define which fields are lucrative based on the individual’s capacities so they are marketable upon completion of their degree. It is a very familiar event when seen in many developing countries for students haven spent so much mentally and financially investing in an unmarketable field end up with no job prospects leading to a change in career part which could have been avoided thereby saving addition money spent on fee.
Although there is a saying that “no knowledge is lost” and founded upon the the fact that one way or the other there is always usefulness in any knowledge attained whether obvious or not. It is also clear that the time arduous time spent in school pursuing a field that is unpropitious could have been time spent using one’s intuition and ingenuity to change the world as shown in the lives of notables live Bill Gates, Steve Jobs, Michael Jackson amongst others.
Moreso, since is could be said that beyond the development of mind, knowledge and character one of the major essence for pursing a field of study is to be able to live at a good standard while utilizing craft from training. If a student is allowed a to pursue a career that is less likely to succeed this essence would have been defeated and this would in return lead to dissatisfaction and sometimes regret and having to figure out one’s part in life based on conceiveable setbacks.
Ultimately, it is without any doubt that is most important for educational institutions to guide against wrong choices in fields less likely to succeed been that they are in the best possible since they have a good interface with the society and vice-versa.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 212, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...rent trends in the world and profession so as to help them define which fields are lucra...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 83, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
...nowledge is lost' and founded upon the the fact that one way or the other there is...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 83, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
...nowledge is lost' and founded upon the the fact that one way or the other there is...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 15, Rule ID: IS_SHOULD[1]
Message: Did you mean 'it'?
Suggestion: it
...Jackson amongst others. Moreso, since is could be said that beyond the developme...
^^
Line 11, column 259, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...erface with the society and vice-versa.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, if, so, well, while, as to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 29.0 19.5258426966 149% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 33.0505617978 82% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 58.6224719101 101% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1856.0 2235.4752809 83% => OK
No of words: 390.0 442.535393258 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.75897435897 5.05705443957 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44391917772 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70709800143 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 215.323595506 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.525641025641 0.4932671777 107% => OK
syllable_count: 582.3 704.065955056 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 20.2370786517 44% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 43.0 23.0359550562 187% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 68.2055716199 60.3974514979 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 206.222222222 118.986275619 173% => OK
Words per sentence: 43.3333333333 23.4991977007 184% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.33333333333 5.21951772744 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.157754592007 0.243740707755 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0669110806621 0.0831039109588 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0392343972526 0.0758088955206 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0830029707302 0.150359130593 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0422940234502 0.0667264976115 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 22.7 14.1392134831 161% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.29 48.8420337079 74% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 18.9 12.1743820225 155% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.22 12.1639044944 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.37 8.38706741573 112% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 100.480337079 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 11.8971910112 155% => OK
gunning_fog: 19.2 11.2143820225 171% => OK
text_standard: 19.0 11.7820224719 161% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.