Claim: Major policy decisions should always be left to politicians and other government experts.
Reason: Politicians and other government experts are more informed and thus have better judgment and perspective than do members of the general public.
The Famous quote “Government is for the people, of the people and by the people” is acknowledge by most of the Peoples. Thus Author’s claim that major Policy decisions should always be left to politicians and other government experts seems to be valid on extreme situations, whereas, in general government should include people of the nation in decision making. Government is formed by people and as a citizen of the nation one should respects the decisions made by the government, however, government of the nation should be capable enough to gain trust and respect from the citizens through their actions.
The reasons for my accordance with the author are politicians are the person elected by the citizens of the nation based on his/her past actions. Thus, citizens should trust their leader as well as his/her decisions. Consider a situation, where government came to know about terrorists intruded into the nation, informing such news to people of the nation for making decision will not only create chaos among people but will also intimidate them. Thus, some decisions should be left on to the politicians and government experts. Consider another example, during wars, citizen of the nation’s should have some faith on the decisions made by politicians and government experts as they are elected by people so that through their decisions they can bring betterment in nations’ people lives. In history, Monarchy is be demolished not because they were not included in decision making but because of those with powers were not able to gain trust of the people through his actions. Hitler is the best example which depicts above scenario.
However, politicians and government experts should not be given all powers of making decisions because constraints in exercising powers will make sure that politicians and government experts are making decisions in favor of people. If any decisions made by government are going to have impacts on people lives then people should be given right in taking part in those decisions. Consider an example, where due to high traffic rates, politicians and government experts decide to build flyovers. If those flyovers will lead to eradicating many people’s home, than government should not make those flyovers, instead, use some others ways to divert the traffic. Thus, above example implicate that each nation should have people representative which can act as a mediator between government and people of the nation. Having people's representative will not only help government in making proper decisions but will also eschew the misunderstanding between government and people of the nation. History is also well-known and provides plethora of example which depicts that if politicians and government doesn’t allow people to make decisions than it can lead to great disaster.
On wrapping up, nations’ people should be included in making decisions but in extreme conditions politicians and government experts should be given enough powers that they can make decisions and people should have faith in those decisions. Both people of the nation and government should have trust and faith in each other to work in harmony.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 95, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'acknowledged'.
Suggestion: acknowledged
...f the people and by the people' is acknowledge by most of the Peoples. Thus Author&apo...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 131, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
... is acknowledge by most of the Peoples. Thus Author's claim that major Policy d...
^^^^
Line 3, column 824, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'been'.
Suggestion: been
...; people lives. In history, Monarchy is be demolished not because they were not in...
^^
Line 3, column 1045, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t example which depicts above scenario. However, politicians and government expe...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 233, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...re making decisions in favor of people. If any decisions made by government are go...
^^
Line 5, column 563, Rule ID: COMMA_THAN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'then'?
Suggestion: then
...to eradicating many people's home, than government should not make those flyove...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, then, thus, well, whereas, in general, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.5258426966 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 25.0 12.4196629213 201% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 21.0 14.8657303371 141% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 33.0505617978 79% => OK
Preposition: 76.0 58.6224719101 130% => OK
Nominalization: 23.0 12.9106741573 178% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2703.0 2235.4752809 121% => OK
No of words: 506.0 442.535393258 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3418972332 5.05705443957 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.7428307748 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83228058969 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 215.323595506 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.397233201581 0.4932671777 81% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 819.0 704.065955056 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 6.24550561798 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.3289350662 60.3974514979 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.263157895 118.986275619 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.6315789474 23.4991977007 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.05263157895 5.21951772744 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.344436346481 0.243740707755 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.146239795692 0.0831039109588 176% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.117619124062 0.0758088955206 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.262127016689 0.150359130593 174% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0422436592186 0.0667264976115 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 14.1392134831 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 48.8420337079 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.1743820225 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.99 12.1639044944 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.7 8.38706741573 92% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 100.480337079 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.8971910112 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.