All to often, companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently. If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees, such consultants would be unnecessary
Author's claim "All to often, companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently. If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees, such consultants would be unnecessary", in my opinion holds little credence as consultants are the one who have great proficiency in doing their jobs and also have quite profound knowledge and experience in tackling different kinds of problems related to companies. However, many hire authorities overlook the problems faced at employee level and instead of concerning to employees to surmount problems they seek advice of the consultant who might fail to resolve it. On the outset, hiring consultant have more advantages compared to seeking advice of employees. Following are the reasons for my accordance with the author.
Firstly, Concerning employees might give jaundiced suggestion as in order to make their profits. Consider an example, If boss seek advice from employees regarding the working efficiency of the other employees, then it might happen that the employee whose advice boss will accept as truth value would state some of the apocryphal statements about other employees who doesn't have good relationship with him/her. Such scenario instead of really understanding the loop holes to improve the work efficiency might not result in understanding the whole situation accurately. Thus, in such situation a third person should be called to evaluate the work efficiency of the employees.
Secondly, Consultants have deep knowledge and experience in their field. Thus, using the knowledge and experience, company can really excel in its workings. There are many problems prevailing in companies thus by hiring consultants to mitigate certain problem would reduce the load on the boss to look after other problems. Consultants expertise also helps company in taking efficient decisions. Consider an example of heresy chocolate, it is one of the well-known chocolate company, but due to growing success and demands, company have faced serious failure because of not able to overcome demands and problems with time. Thus, it was later heresy chocolate hired ERP system to par such difficulty in functioning which include consultants, ERP system implementor, etc.This example aptly illustrate the role of consultant in overcoming the problems and achieve success.
However, Companies to endure in its business should heed problems of employees as employees are the base of the company on which company stand and eluding their problems might cause great harm to company in its functioning and efficiency. Employees should feel equally responsible for company's success and seeking their advice might result in acquiring creative and innovative ideas. Such action would not only make employees active to contribute towards betterment of the company but it might also result in assimilating better ideas in their domain. For example, would consultant able to answer the problems related to functioning of employee's domain accurately without understanding the intricate and minute details of their working? Thus, both employee and consultant should work in accordance to mitigate the problems.
On wrapping up, Consultants are important because of their expertise and knowledge to solve variety of problems however employees are also important to company for their rich knowledge in their domain. Thus both consultant as well as employee should work together to alleviate the problems of the company. This would also allow employees to take part in important decision making and feel responsible in success of the company.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 307, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
... will accept as truth value would state some of the apocryphal statements about other emplo...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 367, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...al statements about other employees who doesnt have good relationship with him/her. Su...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 357, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...oblems. Consultants expertise also helps company in taking efficient decisions. C...
^^
Line 5, column 771, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: This
...onsultants, ERP system implementor, etc.This example aptly illustrate the role of co...
^^^^
Line 9, column 203, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...r their rich knowledge in their domain. Thus both consultant as well as employee sho...
^^^^
Line 9, column 224, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
...e in their domain. Thus both consultant as well as employee should work together to allevi...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, look, really, regarding, second, secondly, so, then, third, thus, well, for example, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 19.5258426966 56% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 12.4196629213 161% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 33.0505617978 82% => OK
Preposition: 89.0 58.6224719101 152% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3087.0 2235.4752809 138% => OK
No of words: 557.0 442.535393258 126% => OK
Chars per words: 5.54219030521 5.05705443957 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.85807034144 4.55969084622 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86475383347 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 259.0 215.323595506 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.464991023339 0.4932671777 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 944.1 704.065955056 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 75.7107968767 60.3974514979 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.217391304 118.986275619 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2173913043 23.4991977007 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.52173913043 5.21951772744 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.388666711252 0.243740707755 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.123601286408 0.0831039109588 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.118677520083 0.0758088955206 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.225779206638 0.150359130593 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.144449695831 0.0667264976115 216% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 14.1392134831 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 48.8420337079 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 12.1743820225 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.15 12.1639044944 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 133.0 100.480337079 132% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.8971910112 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.