The main benefit of the study of history is to dispel the illusion that people living now are significantly different from people who lived in earlier times
Author’s claim “The main benefit of the study of history is to dispel the illusion that people living now are significantly different from people who lived in earlier times”, in my opinion is contentious claim as people behavior haven’t shown an significant change, still there are people who excites quarrels, factions, etc. People still exhibit aggression, anger and so on. However, in technological and economical sense present is no more like history. Problems have be proliferated, intensified or new problems have been encountered. Following are the reasons for accordance towards author’s claim.
Firstly, Consider an example of number of fields of study, over generations, number of fields of study has also increased. For example, in history there were not trends of artificial intelligence or IOT like we have today. The notion of training of machines to make them behave like humans have captivated many science students to work after it. However, in such case history provide no information as such problem is seeded in current scenario. Thus in such case author claim hold strong as history has nothing to offer to solve such problems thus making present different from past.
Secondly, Current problems are different from past in a way that many changes have affected the living conditions of people. In history, literacy rates were quite low which eluded the decision making regarding providing equal knowledge to people of country and considering current situation, people have become more enlighten about the importance of education in one’s life and thus high demands are placed on government . In the past, people were less prone to chronic disease whereas current situation is totally reverted. Due to advancement and introduction of junk foods, people are not immune to many kinds of diseases. Thus, history might defer from present in encountering such kinds of diseases and it’s solutions.
Thirdly, In terms of problems related to nature also, history is quite peaceful compared to current situation. Due to industrialization and high rates of advancement, global warming is also increasing and having severe impact on climate change. Many spices are been categorized in endangered species list and some of the species having extant in past is extinct. Such examples, aptly validates the author claims about studying of history betrays the difference in people living now to people who lived in earlier times.
However, People behavior have not shown significant changes as history is also replete with the wars, quarrels and factions instigated by the behavioral characteristics possess by humans whereas in current situations also people behavior are the reasons for quarrels, factions and wars. People anger and aggression are still the reasons of the plunder.
On wrapping up, I strongly believe that in terms of technological and economical sense present is more complex compared to history whereas socially people still exhibit same behavior as they exhibit in past.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 264, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...m as people behavior haven't shown an significant change, still there are peo...
^^
Line 1, column 427, Rule ID: ECONOMICAL_ECONOMIC[1]
Message: Did you mean 'economic' (=connected with economy)?
Suggestion: economic
...nd so on. However, in technological and economical sense present is no more like history. ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 491, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'been'.
Suggestion: been
... is no more like history. Problems have be proliferated, intensified or new probl...
^^
Line 1, column 519, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...oblems have be proliferated, intensified or new problems have been encountered. F...
^^
Line 3, column 447, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
... problem is seeded in current scenario. Thus in such case author claim hold strong a...
^^^^
Line 5, column 426, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...us high demands are placed on government . In the past, people were less prone to ...
^^
Line 7, column 310, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...egorized in endangered species list and some of the species having extant in past is extinc...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 10, column 71, Rule ID: ECONOMICAL_ECONOMIC[1]
Message: Did you mean 'economic' (=connected with economy)?
Suggestion: economic
...ieve that in terms of technological and economical sense present is more complex compared ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 10, column 200, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the past'?
Suggestion: in the past
...l exhibit same behavior as they exhibit in past.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, if, regarding, second, secondly, so, still, third, thirdly, thus, whereas, for example, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 19.5258426966 128% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 12.4196629213 8% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 33.0505617978 30% => OK
Preposition: 82.0 58.6224719101 140% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 12.9106741573 116% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2575.0 2235.4752809 115% => OK
No of words: 471.0 442.535393258 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.46709129512 5.05705443957 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.65859790218 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85765347591 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 240.0 215.323595506 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.509554140127 0.4932671777 103% => OK
syllable_count: 812.7 704.065955056 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 6.24550561798 16% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.38483146067 205% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 77.0203901306 60.3974514979 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.045454545 118.986275619 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4090909091 23.4991977007 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.21951772744 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 7.80617977528 115% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 5.13820224719 195% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.375439815587 0.243740707755 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0924195698994 0.0831039109588 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.141275322622 0.0758088955206 186% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.188524416435 0.150359130593 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.12360180381 0.0667264976115 185% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 14.1392134831 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 48.8420337079 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 12.1639044944 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.14 8.38706741573 109% => OK
difficult_words: 133.0 100.480337079 132% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.