In this age of intensive media coverage, it is no longer possible for a society to regard any living man or women as a hero
Author claim “In this age of intensive media coverage, it is no longer possible for a society to regard any living man or women as a hero”, in my opinion holds credence as due to easy availability and accessibility of the information, people learn about the real character/behavior about their heroes and media also in pace of making profits, pry on the private life of those heroes and let people to distinguish reel and real behavior of the heroes. I would like to show accordance towards the author claim. Following are the reasons for my accordance.
Firstly, Consider an example of the great legend Lance Armstrong, he was capable to motivate people and influence them through his perseverance by setting an example to fight for life. He had fought with cancer, which was considered as very severe disease at his times. He had also able to captivate people through his innovations and from an age of 10-50 people considered him as their role model or hero. But after coming across the bitter truth about him consuming drugs have had great impact on people as they no more considered him as their hero. This example aptly address the author’s claim. People set some code of conduct and hope that their role model will follow that code of conduct. But due to media, people come to know their real behavior which might not abide with their expectations and such cause might instill hatred and anger among people for their role model.
Secondly, Today’s media coverage also includes many fabricated news. Due to increase competition among various news channels and in order to attract large mass, they dupe with the truth and try to present news in such a way that might arouse debates, controversy among people. In order to profits they interpret certain truths in such a way which might create envy, hatred among people for their heroes. Today, media holds such powers that if they want they can destroy one’s career. People unquestioningly accept the news presented by news and this hobble people to consider any living person as their hero.
However, Media is boon and well as curse. Media coverage not only make people aware about their hero’s flaws but also enlighten them with the positive side of their behavior. Consider an example, Bill Gates, Steves Jobs, Sachin Tendulkar, etc. are heroes for many people and media coverage have played important role in edifying people about their good deeds. Would people came to known about Bill Gates donating large amount of money to a charity, if media coverage doesn’t disseminate such news? Would people able to acknowledge Sachin Tendulkar as best cricketer, if media coverage doesn’t enlighten people about his contribution towards cricket? Thus, Media coverage helps people to choose their heroes.
On wrapping up, Media coverage in today’s scenario plays vital role, it makes people aware about the true behavior of their heroes and author’s claim about media coverage hampering society to choose living man or women as their hero is true if society is not flexible enough to ignore some flaws of their heroes and consider his/her goods deeds while considering him/her as a hero.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 8, column 210, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to live'.
Suggestion: to live
...ia coverage hampering society to choose living man or women as their hero is true if s...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, still, thus, well, while, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 19.5258426966 41% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 14.8657303371 148% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 50.0 33.0505617978 151% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 73.0 58.6224719101 125% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2673.0 2235.4752809 120% => OK
No of words: 527.0 442.535393258 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07210626186 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.79129216042 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56419722113 2.79657885939 92% => OK
Unique words: 256.0 215.323595506 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.485768500949 0.4932671777 98% => OK
syllable_count: 838.8 704.065955056 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 100.776475036 60.3974514979 167% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.217391304 118.986275619 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9130434783 23.4991977007 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.39130434783 5.21951772744 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.228632520016 0.243740707755 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0637641503185 0.0831039109588 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0895644098955 0.0758088955206 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162596375239 0.150359130593 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.125500337008 0.0667264976115 188% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 14.1392134831 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.1639044944 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.23 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 117.0 100.480337079 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.