All too often, companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently. If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees, such consultants would be unnecessary.
According to the claim, companies hire outside consultants for suggestions to operate more efficiently. The author further claims that if they were to spend more time listening to the employee feedback, it would be unnecessary to hire such consultants.
Companies should spend more time listening to their employees rather than consulting other firms. Employees of a company will be aware of the prevalent working environment and are good resources to suggest solutions for improvement. They will be able to come up with ways to improve the current situation in order to operate more efficiently. Employees usually know what is going right and what is wrong in an organization. Collecting that feedback will help the companies to operate more efficiently. Some of the dissatisfaction of the employees will be brought up, given more time for listening to the feedback. Those can be corrected to make the environment more comfortable. More comfortable the environment is, more productive the work and a good working environment will help the companies to function smoothly.
Outside consultants hired by companies may not have the core business idea about a company and might not be able to suggest helpful ways to improve the current operation. Also if the employees disagree the suggestions given by outsiders it might cause chaos within the organization, thus hindering it to operate well. Also a solution used to improve a condition in one company may not work for another. The consultants are in a drawback here. It would be better if a company asks its employees rather than hiring outsider.
On the other hand, consultants would have worked in different companies and may have experienced different situations and may have come up with different solutions to improve the operations. Also they might be a connoisseur to solve a particular problem in a company. Further consultants can be asked to come up with different solutions and the team leaders can pick one based on their or their employees interest. Sometimes taking an experts solution is better than working out trial and error method by incorporating ways suggested by employees not aware of a certain problem.
So, it would be better if companies spend more time listening to their employees through surveys, questionnaires, meetups to discuss ways to improve the current situation and operate more efficiently. Hiring outside consultants would be unnecessary if employees are able to provide good suggestions in order for the company to operate more efficiently.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 503, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: Some
... companies to operate more efficiently. Some of the dissatisfaction of the employees will b...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 615, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this can' or 'Those cans'?
Suggestion: This can; Those cans
...ore time for listening to the feedback. Those can be corrected to make the environment mo...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 17, column 172, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
... ways to improve the current operation. Also if the employees disagree the suggestio...
^^^^
Line 17, column 319, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...ion, thus hindering it to operate well. Also a solution used to improve a condition ...
^^^^
Line 25, column 192, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...nt solutions to improve the operations. Also they might be a connoisseur to solve a ...
^^^^
Line 25, column 436, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'experts'' or 'expert's'?
Suggestion: experts'; expert's
...employees interest. Sometimes taking an experts solution is better than working out tri...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, may, so, thus, well, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 21.0 12.4196629213 169% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 11.3162921348 18% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 33.0505617978 48% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 58.6224719101 99% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 12.9106741573 116% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2175.0 2235.4752809 97% => OK
No of words: 405.0 442.535393258 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.37037037037 5.05705443957 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48604634366 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03609741562 2.79657885939 109% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 215.323595506 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.404938271605 0.4932671777 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 668.7 704.065955056 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.725193702 60.3974514979 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.571428571 118.986275619 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2857142857 23.4991977007 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.28571428571 5.21951772744 44% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.499764275622 0.243740707755 205% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.184707420754 0.0831039109588 222% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.134145567434 0.0758088955206 177% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.363935721553 0.150359130593 242% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.143929059955 0.0667264976115 216% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 14.1392134831 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 48.8420337079 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.1639044944 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.58 8.38706741573 90% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 100.480337079 77% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.