As people rely more and more on technology, the ability of humans to think for themselves deteriorates.
Usage of emerging technology in day-to-day life has been tremendously increasing in the past few years. This does not mean that the reliance on upcoming technology and innovations has led to deterioration of the critical thinking ability of the human beings.
Workforce behind research and innovations are mainly responsible for the success of technology. Critical thinking, problem solving strategies and decision-making being key elements for designing, implementing new technologies improve the thinking ability of the humans.
For example, invention of automobiles increases convenience without which humans would have to think about other alternatives. This has further lead to thoughts about conservation of environment due to environmental pollution. Also humans have continued to think of measures to reduce pollution by standardizing emission tests, etcetra.
Use of devices and instruments such as calculators simplify mathematical tasks enabling humans to devote more time to complex tasks. Thus technology does not prevent humans from thinking or making decisions.
Considering the above mentioned examples we can assure the growth of human thinking capability with increasing use of technology in varied domains.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 228, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...ronment due to environmental pollution. Also humans have continued to think of measu...
^^^^
Line 4, column 135, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...s to devote more time to complex tasks. Thus technology does not prevent humans from...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, thus, for example, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 19.5258426966 15% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 12.4196629213 16% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 14.8657303371 34% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 11.3162921348 18% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 4.0 33.0505617978 12% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 58.6224719101 58% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1060.0 2235.4752809 47% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 176.0 442.535393258 40% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.02272727273 5.05705443957 119% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64232057368 4.55969084622 80% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.23811798084 2.79657885939 116% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 215.323595506 56% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.6875 0.4932671777 139% => OK
syllable_count: 329.4 704.065955056 47% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.59117977528 119% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 20.2370786517 49% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.0716356609 60.3974514979 48% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 106.0 118.986275619 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6 23.4991977007 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.21951772744 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 10.2758426966 39% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.244120798575 0.243740707755 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.084755076891 0.0831039109588 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0451822285135 0.0758088955206 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117666173894 0.150359130593 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0358912374962 0.0667264976115 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 14.1392134831 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 28.84 48.8420337079 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 12.1743820225 111% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.34 12.1639044944 143% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.49 8.38706741573 125% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 100.480337079 67% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 33.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 2.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.