Claim: Major policy decisions should always be left to politicians and other government experts.
Reason: Politicians and other government experts are more informed and thus have better judgment and perspective than do members of the general public.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which that claim is based.
Who should be responsible for formation of major policies? The prompt claims that the major policies decisions should always be left to politicians and experts claiming the reason that they are well informed about the the issues than the general public. I mostly agree with and claim and and think that the reason given for the claim in the prompt is well justified.
First of all, the politicians have devoted most of their life towards the learning the policies, formulation of policies and implementation of those policies. Similarly, the experts are those people who have extensive knowledge on specific subject. When polices are being formulated it prudent that they should be involved and should not be interfered. For instance, in the formulation of Building Codes, it is wise to left those decision to the people who know more about building in general like structure engineers, architects, construction managers, politicians who are experienced in land use laws etc. The polices that are formulated by those people will be most likely to a functional one.
Secondly, when group of experts are left on their own to formulate something, the result is bound to be a good one. As history suggests, whenever a group of highly talented individuals are grouped to accomplish something then that goal is completed within time and with good results. When experts are grouped together, there is a influx of great ideas and innovation, they compliment each other. For instance, Manhattan project in which group of highly skilled individual were left to accomplish the goal of building a Nuclear Bomb, it was completed with in limited time frame. We can also look at the example, where interference in the work of experts lead to a disaster. During the 1920s in Russia, government decided to interfere with the research projects and directed the scientists to research based on the government need. As a result of which, there was nothing significant invention from Russia from that period. So, interference in the work of the experts is not beneficial to the experts, nor the society as a whole.
But, as the polices involves the people, it is counter-intuitive to not include people in the policy making formation. But as the knowledge of the general public is limited, cannot have a clear judgement regarding the issues, it is better to exclude the general public in this process. Similarly, it can be argued that handful of experts and politicians can formulate polices that may be inclined towards certain demographics. But these things are to be checked by the higher authority and make sure that these kind of irregularities does not happen in policy formation.
In conclusion, the major policies should be formulated by the experts in those field but those formulated polices should be checked and balanced by the higher authority so that irregularities does not happen, and formed polices are beneficial to the whole society.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 136, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...icies decisions should always be left to politicians and experts claiming the rea...
^^
Line 1, column 216, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
...eason that they are well informed about the the issues than the general public. I mostl...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 216, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
...eason that they are well informed about the the issues than the general public. I mostl...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 240, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
... informed about the the issues than the general public. I mostly agree with and claim and and ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 286, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: and
...l public. I mostly agree with and claim and and think that the reason given for the cla...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 240, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...who have extensive knowledge on specific subject. When polices are being formulat...
^^
Line 9, column 329, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
... experts are grouped together, there is a influx of great ideas and innovation, t...
^
Line 13, column 148, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
... formation. But as the knowledge of the general public is limited, cannot have a clear judgeme...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 255, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...the issues, it is better to exclude the general public in this process. Similarly, it can be a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 506, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this kind' or 'these kinds'?
Suggestion: this kind; these kinds
...the higher authority and make sure that these kind of irregularities does not happen in po...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, look, may, regarding, second, secondly, similarly, so, then, well, for instance, in conclusion, in general, kind of, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 34.0 19.5258426966 174% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 21.0 11.3162921348 186% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 33.0505617978 100% => OK
Preposition: 68.0 58.6224719101 116% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 12.9106741573 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2473.0 2235.4752809 111% => OK
No of words: 482.0 442.535393258 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13070539419 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.68556276237 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85227986387 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 221.0 215.323595506 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.458506224066 0.4932671777 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 767.7 704.065955056 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.10617977528 225% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.0069766818 60.3974514979 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.761904762 118.986275619 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9523809524 23.4991977007 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.80952380952 5.21951772744 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 7.80617977528 128% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.311221127315 0.243740707755 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0857237472439 0.0831039109588 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0890262572223 0.0758088955206 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170587101927 0.150359130593 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0883013804595 0.0667264976115 132% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 14.1392134831 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.77 12.1639044944 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.27 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 100.480337079 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.