the best way to teach is to praise positive action and ignore negative ones
It might seems logical at first glance that one must praise the god points and ignore the negative ones, however, in order to get complete ideal about the given statement, we must take consideration of following ideals, as it will help with explicitly claims our reasoning.
Firstly, as author suggested that considering the good points help an individual to flourish seems very judge mental, who are we to judge? Particular individual has particular peculiarity and accordingly he/she may behave we are nobody to judge someone for instance Michael Jordan was not selected in his high school basketball team latterly he turn out to be a paragon of basketball aspirants ones negative and positive points are temporary and doesn’t last longer as changing attitude towards negative points can eventually help to convert them to positive for Michael Jordan basketball was a negative point to which he eventually changes to positive one, similarly who will decide what is good and what is wrong with an individual, praising good point may definitely boost the confidence of an individual but ignoring the negative ones is equally detrimental and his motivation may be last to improve it.
Taking an example of a student good in science should be definitely praised but ignoring the weaker subject of students for instance Math lead to detrimental effect on overall score in examination similarly if student willingly to give an competitive exam, just by ignoring the weaker subject certainly he end-up with lower grade.
Conclusively, praising a positive point is important but similarly ignoring the negative one leads to detrimental as well as it hamper the individual to become an accomplish individual
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 346, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'turns'.
Suggestion: turns
...high school basketball team latterly he turn out to be a paragon of basketball aspir...
^^^^
Line 3, column 395, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...to be a paragon of basketball aspirants ones negative and positive points are tempo...
^^^^
Line 3, column 408, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...on of basketball aspirants ones negative and positive points are temporary and do...
^^
Line 5, column 237, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
... similarly if student willingly to give an competitive exam, just by ignoring the ...
^^
Line 7, column 161, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...l as it hamper the individual to become an accomplish individual
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, but, first, firstly, however, if, may, similarly, so, well, for instance, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 33.0505617978 54% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 58.6224719101 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1442.0 2235.4752809 65% => OK
No of words: 273.0 442.535393258 62% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28205128205 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.55969084622 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87436810034 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 215.323595506 71% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.56043956044 0.4932671777 114% => OK
syllable_count: 472.5 704.065955056 67% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 20.2370786517 25% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 54.0 23.0359550562 234% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 227.193661883 60.3974514979 376% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 288.4 118.986275619 242% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 54.6 23.4991977007 232% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 19.4 5.21951772744 372% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 10.2758426966 39% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.219823029506 0.243740707755 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.125376613527 0.0831039109588 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.083130274522 0.0758088955206 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150904984173 0.150359130593 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0589309837023 0.0667264976115 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 30.7 14.1392134831 217% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: 8.21 48.8420337079 17% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 15.9 7.92365168539 201% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 25.5 12.1743820225 209% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 14.23 12.1639044944 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.07 8.38706741573 120% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 100.480337079 65% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 20.0 11.8971910112 168% => OK
gunning_fog: 23.6 11.2143820225 210% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 31.0 11.7820224719 263% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.