The best way to teach is to praise positive action and ignore negative ones.
Any person by default have positive and negative sides in himself and also in case of learning adapt both positive and negative attitudes in the process. The author claim that to teach anyone the best approach is to praise the positive action and ignore the negative ones, while I concede with the first part but completely disagree with the second part of the claim that is to ignore the negative ones. Without adressing the negatives sides no one can get develop since a little bit of positive and negative will negate each other keeping us static.
Everywhere in this society and even in retrospect we can see that both positive and negative actions comprises an event. But if we focus only on the positive and actions and keep ignoring the negative ones it will come haunting in many levels. Firstly just because we ignore the negative action does not mean that the perilous thing is not happening and if left unnoticed it will keep growing in silent and destroy everything at the end. Take the leader Adolf Hitler for example, he of course had some positive leadership qualities in himself but since his negative sides were ignored by the people around him, the negative sides and thoughts of his character took the majority of his thought and took active part in destroying the lives of so many people and the world's peace which recalled as one of the greatest event of history as World War II till now.
While teaching someone, we often take test to identify the depth of that person's knowledge and status so that we can assess which steps to follow to take the best action to teach that person for amelioration. In this case it is very necessary to extol for any laudable action and more necessary to address the negatives ones so that the person can work on it can bring the best verson of himself which is good for both his personal life and so for the world. For example if we do not adress the wrong manners in a students and keep praising him only for the good deeds soon we will see a change in that studenst with arrogance and pride since unless addresses he is totally unware of the negative sides he has and start thinking of himself as the epitome of praisable works only. Rather than making hima complete person it will destroy the capability and that students.
Every person needs a appreciation for his good work. This gives motivation and encourages further growth but without mentioning the negative ones and that the perosn can work on to make himself better, we cannot expect any further prosperity from that person he will kepp repeating his existing pattern and will ultimately fail to keep pace with the changinf world. Even if we decide to ignore a random bad action and without rasing voice for the negative praise him on the contrary for the goods he has done and expect that he will understand all by himself, this thought is nothing but a naive thought which actually in reality promotes toxicity in our space and also shows weakness of our own character. SInce it is very easy to fawning rather telling the truth which the receiver might not like and push yourself in a not so comfortable situation.
So, to ensure a balanced humanity and environment in this world we need to strike the perfect balance in addressing other negative sides and also in cases praise the good deeds.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 96, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to adapt'
Suggestion: to adapt
...in himself and also in case of learning adapt both positive and negative attitudes in...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 474, Rule ID: LITTLE_BIT[1]
Message: Reduce redundancy by using 'little' or 'bit'.
Suggestion: little; bit
...es sides no one can get develop since a little bit of positive and negative will negate ea...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 589, Rule ID: NOUN_AROUND_IT[1]
Message: Consider using 'the surrounding people'?
Suggestion: the surrounding people
...ince his negative sides were ignored by the people around him, the negative sides and thoughts of his...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 765, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'worlds'' or 'world's'?
Suggestion: worlds'; world's
...ing the lives of so many people and the worlds peace which recalled as one of the grea...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 74, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...take test to identify the depth of that persons knowledge and status so that we can ass...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 321, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...more necessary to address the negatives ones so that the person can work on it can b...
^^^^
Line 7, column 20, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...nd that students. Every person needs a appreciation for his good work. This gi...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, firstly, if, second, so, while, for example, of course, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 19.5258426966 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 12.4196629213 137% => OK
Conjunction : 35.0 14.8657303371 235% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.3162921348 159% => OK
Pronoun: 60.0 33.0505617978 182% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 71.0 58.6224719101 121% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2738.0 2235.4752809 122% => OK
No of words: 587.0 442.535393258 133% => OK
Chars per words: 4.66439522998 5.05705443957 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.9222030514 4.55969084622 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.32668776711 2.79657885939 83% => OK
Unique words: 272.0 215.323595506 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.463373083475 0.4932671777 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 885.6 704.065955056 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 36.0 23.0359550562 156% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 98.2275538927 60.3974514979 163% => OK
Chars per sentence: 171.125 118.986275619 144% => OK
Words per sentence: 36.6875 23.4991977007 156% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.1875 5.21951772744 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 7.80617977528 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 5.13820224719 195% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.322182753466 0.243740707755 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121088569968 0.0831039109588 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.094821046374 0.0758088955206 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.199844883323 0.150359130593 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.12690261124 0.0667264976115 190% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.9 14.1392134831 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.4 48.8420337079 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 12.1743820225 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.34 12.1639044944 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.73 8.38706741573 104% => OK
difficult_words: 123.0 100.480337079 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.4 11.2143820225 146% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.