The chart below shows the range of activities performed online by individuals in the United Kingdom in 2018.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The figure depicts the extent of interest that the people of United Kingdom had online in 2018. A total of 9 tasks are listed in the graph.
Firstly, it is observed that maximum percentage of individuals were exchanging email online which is over 80%. Besides, 'researching for good and services' have the second highest share of nearly 80%. Secondly, the least stake is captured by 'selling goods and services'. Moreover, none of activities has less than 20% share.
Out of nine only two of the criteria has response percentage around 30% and the rest are near or more than 60%. This represents that the activities are highly skewed towards above average range. 'Watching online video content', 'Social networking' and 'Online banking' are in between 60% to 70%, that is 33% of the total response fell in this area.
To conclude it can be said that Great Britain community carry out a great load of task online which is reflected through their percentage of uses in higher ends of the spectrum.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 141, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...is reflected through their percentage of uses in higher ends of the spectrum.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, firstly, moreover, second, secondly, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 825.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 170.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.85294117647 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61087313685 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41922089892 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.658823529412 0.547539520022 120% => OK
syllable_count: 252.0 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.3019083506 43.030603864 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.5 112.824112599 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0 22.9334400587 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 5.23603664747 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.106806938566 0.215688989381 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0391490722069 0.103423049105 38% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0480011041433 0.0843802449381 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0651501369252 0.15604864568 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0413972448887 0.0819641961636 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 13.2329268293 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 61.2550243902 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.55 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.66 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.