Is the best way to teach praising positive actions or prasing the negative acts? To teach is not just the act of passing knowlwedge in a classroom by a lecturer or professor, but any act that serves to impact knowledge or imformation in any form to others. While to some, positive actions by an individual or people should be praised, to others, it is the negative acts that should be lauded with the intent that probably some may learn. However, based on the numerous evidence it is clear that negative actions like war, violence, rape or any form of wrong act should by no means be praised because by recognising and lauding such act of evil you are reinforcing evil, wickedness and violence.
To teach others, people in authority or high places of power should learn to praise positive actions as this has been learnt to boost moral. For instance, a teacher teaching age 2 to 4 students, should laud the good acts of the students, from showing love to other kid or the kid making a good painting. This instills a positive outlook to live on the kids and they learn also to praise other good acts. Great acts should always be praised as it is of essence eben in this more vicious world.
When violent acts like mass shooting are carried out, TV stations are increasingly avoiding to show the faces of the mass shooters as it has ein learnt from studies that this short moment of fame is gratifying to such criminals. Stations like CNN are incrasingly saying they would not show the face of such vicious killers robbing them the fame they would have loved to have. This reinforce the act of ignoring negative acts and teaching others with similar evilintent that no fame would be given. Also the killing by a white supremist of some protesters in the early reigns of President Trump administration was seen as vicious but much criticism was handed on the President as he failed to deter such evil act rather he stayed neutral claiming both sides were wrong.The claims on contention was that it was a negative action and such negative acts should not be praised.
In conclusion, it can be clearly seen that when negative actions are praise more doom and evil is iminent. Rather generous acts of love, peace, and goodness should be praised, recognised and eventually be emulated by others.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 499, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...evilintent that no fame would be given. Also the killing by a white supremist of som...
^^^^
Line 5, column 769, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
... neutral claiming both sides were wrong.The claims on contention was that it was a ...
^^^
Line 7, column 108, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Rather,
...e praise more doom and evil is iminent. Rather generous acts of love, peace, and goodn...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, look, may, so, still, while, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 19.5258426966 138% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 33.0505617978 79% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 58.6224719101 92% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1897.0 2235.4752809 85% => OK
No of words: 403.0 442.535393258 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.70719602978 5.05705443957 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48049772903 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48607250422 2.79657885939 89% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 215.323595506 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.496277915633 0.4932671777 101% => OK
syllable_count: 576.9 704.065955056 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.2370786517 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 23.0359550562 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 76.7085658948 60.3974514979 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.5 118.986275619 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.7857142857 23.4991977007 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.71428571429 5.21951772744 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.238064627035 0.243740707755 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116298511681 0.0831039109588 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.156670549103 0.0758088955206 207% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147836324214 0.150359130593 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0668353429262 0.0667264976115 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 14.1392134831 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.98 48.8420337079 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.8 12.1743820225 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.63 12.1639044944 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 100.480337079 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.8971910112 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 11.2143820225 118% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.