The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones.
In this era, Learning is self-motivating activity where resources are everywhere so teaching with right attitude is essential. According to the give prompt, to induce a learning mentality it crucial to encourage the positive activities and outlook the negative ones. I mostly disagree with this prompt due to three reasons.
Firstly, if no negative aspect of the work is communicated to the learner by the teacher, student won’t improve. People should understand that the negative actions are the ones they make while learning and it will be stepping stone of them to improve in long run. For Instance, in toastmasters club which is group of individuals dedicated to improve public speaking, there negative actions are highlighted of the speakers after speech which makes them aware of the mistakes they are doing and it helps them to avoid those wrongdoing eventually leading them to become a confident public speaker. Thus, positive criticism is good if taken in a good sense because it makes learner aware of the mistakes they are doing and improve on that aspect.
Also, there is an idiom “Too much sweet is bitter “. Likewise, if a person is praised only for the good actions ignoring the negative one’s they tend to have a negligent attitude. They may think they know everything leading them to become presumptuous person. To illustrate, if a child is always praised by their parents, who are child’s first teacher, they tend to develop overconfident attitude in them. When they become adults and get to the real world, they are considered arrogant. Therefore, it is essential for making people aware that they are not perfect because if they only show positive side, they become a “know it all” kind of person.
Lastly, no one is expert in any field, even the expert is continuously learning. So, it is not justifiable to poke on the negative actions of the one who is shows interest to learn and trying. It sometimes demotivates the person when negative things are highlighted more often. For example, Barak Obama, in one of his interviews, said he hates math and often try to escape math questions because teacher in his mid-school used to continuously point on his mistakes, not ignoring his efforts to solve the math problem. These types of interest led him to deliberately skip math class and later he studied law where he required no math knowledge. Thus, it is crucial to make learner understand that there is good side of their work leading them to be consistent and never giving up on anything.
All in all, teaching is a complex process and it requires both pinpointing the negative and positive side by teacher. Balanced criticism and praise are required to motivate a person.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 516, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this wrongdoing' or 'those wrongdoings'?
Suggestion: this wrongdoing; those wrongdoings
...ey are doing and it helps them to avoid those wrongdoing eventually leading them to become a con...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 25, Rule ID: EN_UNPAIRED_BRACKETS
Message: Unpaired symbol: '”' seems to be missing
...n that aspect. Also, there is an idiom “Too much sweet is bitter “. Likewise, if...
^
Line 3, column 51, Rule ID: EN_UNPAIRED_BRACKETS
Message: Unpaired symbol: '”' seems to be missing
...e is an idiom “Too much sweet is bitter “. Likewise, if a person is praised only ...
^
Line 3, column 322, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...ild is always praised by their parents, who are child’s first teacher, they tend to dev...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 196, Rule ID: PRP_RB_NO_VB[1]
Message: Are you missing a verb?
... shows interest to learn and trying. It sometimes demotivates the person when negative things are hig...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, if, lastly, likewise, look, may, so, therefore, thus, while, for example, for instance, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 29.0 19.5258426966 149% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 12.4196629213 24% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 48.0 33.0505617978 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 54.0 58.6224719101 92% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 12.9106741573 8% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2260.0 2235.4752809 101% => OK
No of words: 455.0 442.535393258 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96703296703 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61852021839 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70434179745 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 229.0 215.323595506 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.503296703297 0.4932671777 102% => OK
syllable_count: 718.2 704.065955056 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.8020026241 60.3974514979 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.619047619 118.986275619 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6666666667 23.4991977007 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.57142857143 5.21951772744 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 5.13820224719 195% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.214211217921 0.243740707755 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0647483558198 0.0831039109588 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0699428243356 0.0758088955206 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118281547275 0.150359130593 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0287380165615 0.0667264976115 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 14.1392134831 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 12.1639044944 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.22 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 100.480337079 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.