The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones.
Teachers play a pivotal role in society. The approaches they choose to teach in the class are subjected to the wide academic papers. One of the most important approaches which are highly recommended to the teachers is praising positive actions and turning a blind eye on negative ones. I believe that using this method of tutoring is beneficial for students of all ages. However, we cannot merely use this method because sometimes ignoring the negative points can have destroying consequences.
first, praising motivates students that they are in a proper track and encourages them to have a good feeling about themselves. Whenever an individual leaves the school or university, his feeling is reflected by the reactions of his teacher. As far as he gets a praise, he will be persuaded to work harder. Take a young student as an example, constantly blaming her for her performance, not only would not persuade her to work harder at home but also it would function as a barrier since it would tear down her self-confidence. It should be mentioned that using this method would have irreversible effects on various aspects of anyone’s life.
On the other hand, Teachers should not ignore all the negative behavior, mistakes of the children since can lead them to be a wrong path. overlooking the negative points would put students in a situation that they will not grasp why despite putting many efforts and having obtaining excellent reaction by the teachers, he is not successful in his career. In Iran, as an example, students need to pass an entrance exam to enter university. Passing the exam is an arduous task needed a year-long studying and planning. If a teacher does not mention a student’s mistakes during the year, he would not able to be admitted into a university. Consequently, this failure would have unbearable consequences in his future.
In conclusion, I believe that the system of education, the institute should concentrate their teaching method on encouraging students. However, mentioning destructive mistakes should be considered by them since a person who chooses a particular major are not aware of his decision.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-28 | nha1806 | view | |
| 2024-10-31 | ekarumeblessing@icloud.com | 79 | view |
| 2024-10-22 | Celestina Asantewaa | 50 | view |
| 2024-10-13 | ekarumeblessing@icloud.com | 58 | view |
| 2024-08-31 | hainess25 | 70 | view |
- or schools, assessing teachers’ teaching efficiency is a very important issue. But is it better for other teachers to assess or let students assess teachers? 73
- Some people think university professors should spend more time doing research while others think they should spend more time educating students. What is your view? 71
- Some people think university professors should spend more time doing research while others think they should spend more time educating students. What is your view? 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Television advertising directed toward young children (aged two to five) should not be allowed. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 66
- Life is today is easier and more comfortable than it was when your grandparent were children. 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: First
...s can have destroying consequences. first, praising motivates students that they ...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 139, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Overlooking
...since can lead them to be a wrong path. overlooking the negative points would put students ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, however, if, look, so, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 12.4196629213 137% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 14.8657303371 40% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 36.0 33.0505617978 109% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 58.6224719101 72% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1801.0 2235.4752809 81% => OK
No of words: 352.0 442.535393258 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11647727273 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33147354134 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95816948849 2.79657885939 106% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 215.323595506 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.565340909091 0.4932671777 115% => OK
syllable_count: 563.4 704.065955056 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.1151604648 60.3974514979 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.055555556 118.986275619 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5555555556 23.4991977007 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.83333333333 5.21951772744 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.116799746311 0.243740707755 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0357358053067 0.0831039109588 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.064805877283 0.0758088955206 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0777739546298 0.150359130593 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0809452413638 0.0667264976115 121% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 14.1392134831 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.8420337079 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.1639044944 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.2 8.38706741573 110% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 100.480337079 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.