Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Universities should require every graduating students to take public speaking courses. Give specific examples and details to support your answer.
In the course of life, people may find themselves in a situation that is needed to talk in front of a group of people. Some of them are struggling to find a way to relieve their tension and stress. They feel shame to talk for an audience and this shame limits their ability to get their idea across to listeners. A Group of people believes that teachers and schools should teach students how to speak in the public and prepare them for these situations. however, I disagree with the idea. I believe this way because of two main reasons that I am going to explore in the following essay.
First and foremost, speaking in the public is not teachable and students should learn it by experience. Accordingly, Main barriers to having a perfect speaking are distress and burden. Tension and stress limit mind activities and if speakers do not have adequate and meaningful experiences in their life, they could not overcome restrictions. It should be stressed that even skilled people may face reactions of their bodies like increasing respiration rate and sweating of hands during speaking in public. Although it is tremendously hard, people gain the ability more by experience rather than being taught by someone else. My university offered this course for junior students and I thought that it would be beneficial to take the course. After graduation, I found a job in the education. I need to talk in front of parents of my student and make them aware of school's program in the following year. I felt unbelievable tension for the first meeting but, I learned how to break free from the stress as time passed. It should be mentioned that nonetheless, I reviewed the course before the first meeting, it didn't help me.
another equally silent point in corroborating my stance on this subject is that providing the course for all the students is waste of time and resources. the content of the public speaking course is limited. Instead of taking it, students can take a more beneficial course which is more related to their field. On the other hand, availability of the course means that universities should spend money and allocate additional budget to hire and add a new person to faculty members. It should be stressed that students can find effective online courses on the Youtube. Few students need to speak publicly in their career. If they want to prepare themselves, they can search on the internet.
In a nutshell, I believe that colleges and university should not oblige their students to take a public speaking course because it will waste their time and their resources.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 455, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: However
... and prepare them for these situations. however, I disagree with the idea. I believe th...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 116, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...uld learn it by experience. Accordingly, Main barriers to having a perfect speaki...
^^
Line 3, column 1112, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...the course before the first meeting, it didnt help me. another equally silent point ...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Another
...e the first meeting, it didnt help me. another equally silent point in corroborating m...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 154, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...tudents is waste of time and resources. the content of the public speaking course i...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, but, first, however, if, may, nonetheless, so, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 9.8082437276 173% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 13.8261648746 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 57.0 43.0788530466 132% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 59.0 52.1666666667 113% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2142.0 1977.66487455 108% => OK
No of words: 442.0 407.700716846 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84615384615 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.58517132086 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64414117737 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 212.727598566 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.490950226244 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 648.9 618.680645161 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 16.0 9.59856630824 167% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.5232388378 48.9658058833 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.25 100.406767564 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4166666667 20.6045352989 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.20833333333 5.45110844103 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.85842293907 233% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.17416625949 0.236089414692 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0567038760541 0.076458572812 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0512606088839 0.0737576698707 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121216340052 0.150856017488 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0239236101379 0.0645574589148 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 11.7677419355 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.85 10.9000537634 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.78 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 86.8835125448 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.