Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Universities should require every graduating students to take public speaking courses. Give specific examples and details to support your answer.

Essay topics:

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Universities should require every graduating students to take public speaking courses. Give specific examples and details to support your answer.

Nobody can overlook the fact that in this sophisticated, and progressive world, where we live, the ability to present the ideas can be a considerable requisition for every human success. While some people hold the opinion that the universities should not coerce students to take a public presentation course, some others stand at the other side of this continuum and believe that this course should be obligatory. As far as I am concerned, I agree with the latter group, and my justifications to substantiate my point of view are elaborated hereupon.

To begin with, taking the public speaking course should be mandatory for students because it can be beneficial in various stages of their lives. IN other words, If the student acquires the ability to present their notions, it will be so advantageous in their educational study. For example, every student in the master or Ph.D. level should represent several presentations not only for their thesis but also for most of their courses projects. I can remember that during my master education, I did a vast amount of presentations for my math project, seminar, and modeling classes. As a result, when a student has done a public presentation over and over, It guarantees their success in thesis defense because not only the stress level has declined in a high degree but also the self-confidence has increased.

Furthermore, knowing the presentation skills could be a very powerful and noticeable prerequisite factor for future career success. In other words, when every student looks for a job, at first glance, they should be able to present themselves effectively and properly. And this fact could not be achieved unless by a very efficacious background about public speaking. For example, about five years ago, I was invited to an interview in a very big oil company. At every stage of my interview, I had to speak in front of a group of senior managers of that company. Fortunately, thanks to my useful background for public speaking, I could wrestle with that situation in the best manner and got the job. Consequently, learning speaking abilities is a crucial and determiner agent for finding a satisfactory job.

In a nutshell, according to the aforementioned reasons, I am of the opinion that the universities should force students to take the public speaking course. Not only does this action help them to pass their educational projects in a convincing way, but also it is an advantageous agent for success in finding their future career.

Votes
Average: 7 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 724, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to speak'.
Suggestion: to speak
...and got the job. Consequently, learning speaking abilities is a crucial and determiner a...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 228, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a convincing way" with adverb for "convincing"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...them to pass their educational projects in a convincing way, but also it is an advantageous agent f...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, furthermore, if, look, so, while, for example, as a result, in other words, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 43.0788530466 97% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 52.1666666667 90% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2097.0 1977.66487455 106% => OK
No of words: 415.0 407.700716846 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05301204819 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51348521516 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98868626807 2.67179642975 112% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 212.727598566 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.506024096386 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 657.9 618.680645161 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.5698485607 48.9658058833 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.352941176 100.406767564 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4117647059 20.6045352989 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.11764705882 5.45110844103 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.142354936214 0.236089414692 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0549096979397 0.076458572812 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0546893190842 0.0737576698707 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101007949367 0.150856017488 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0140947618468 0.0645574589148 22% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 11.7677419355 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 58.1214874552 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 10.9000537634 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 86.8835125448 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 10.002688172 150% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.247311828 146% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.