tpo 42
Both the passage and the lecture put forth on the solutions to prevent damages that threaten birds when they hit the glass. The author brings three solutions, however, the professor asserts that none of those solutions can be effective according to reasons that are elaborated hereupon
First, the writer alleges that using one-way glass can be a good solution to prevent damages. However, the lecturer refutes this notion because in his view these glasses act as a mirror, so they can be as dangerous as simple glasses because when the birds see the reflection of sky and tree in the glass they think that they are real and fly toward them.
Furthermore, the text argues that using colorful designs can be a good solution. However, the talk rebuts this opinion because when the birds see the simple sections, they envision them as open holes, hence, fly through them and if we want to solve this problem we should make these sections very small but this action causes darkness inside the building.
Finally, the author indicates that using a magnetic field is a beneficial solution. However, the lecture rejects this solution by explaining that birds use the magnetic field for their long-distance trips but for their short-distance trip it is not applicable, and birds use their eyes and the brightness of the light for this purpose. Therefore, this method cannot be effective.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, so, therefore
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 22.412803532 147% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 14.0 30.3222958057 46% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1160.0 1373.03311258 84% => OK
No of words: 231.0 270.72406181 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02164502165 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89854898053 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.495579946 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 145.348785872 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5670995671 0.540411800872 105% => OK
syllable_count: 343.8 419.366225166 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 13.0662251656 61% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 21.2450331126 132% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 91.6583329545 49.2860985944 186% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.0 110.228320801 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.875 21.698381199 133% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.375 7.06452816374 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.27373068433 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.395235525097 0.272083759551 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.153617021295 0.0996497079465 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.073742730131 0.0662205650399 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.225158463847 0.162205337803 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0793797481772 0.0443174109184 179% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.3589403974 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 53.8541721854 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.0289183223 118% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.43 12.2367328918 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.78 8.42419426049 104% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 63.6247240618 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.0 10.7273730684 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.498013245 126% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 11.2008830022 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.