the best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones
Teaching is not simple a profession to earn money. It is addendum with responsibility to shape the student to become a versatile person. Above statement claims that “the best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones”. I completely disagree with the approach. Though it seems to encourage students at first, surely will not provide expected results at the end.
Let's consider the situation where we praise the students on the positive actions and ignore the negative ones. This is probably build over confidence in the student, as they start feeling that whatever action they perform will be correct. This will make the student stubborn and they will not be ready to hear any negative comments from anyone in the society. As we are not raising any voice on negative actions, even those will be considered as the positive ones and will be repeated further. In this way we are actually allowing them to commit negative actions.
Also, with this attitude they can never correct the mistakes they performed and can never learn any new thing. Society is a vast place where people are judged on the actions they perform. If we don't make students aware of the negative actions it will be difficult for them to sustain in such society. They can't handle any negative words against them.
At last following such approach will make the students stubborn and reluctant to hear negative comments. Instead, praising positive actions and making them to realize on the negative actions will actual help the students to learn many things like, acceptance, differentiation between positive and negative actions, good and bad deeds, being stable at all conditions etc. This will help the student to develop their mental and physical strengths and abilities which in turn helps in developing a better society.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: LETS_LET[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Let's'?
Suggestion: Let's
...t provide expected results at the end. Lets consider the situation where we praise ...
^^^^
Line 2, column 128, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'builded', 'built'.
Suggestion: builded; built
...ore the negative ones. This is probably build over confidence in the student, as they...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 194, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...dged on the actions they perform. If we dont make students aware of the negative act...
^^^^
Line 3, column 306, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...r them to sustain in such society. They cant handle any negative words against them....
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, first, if, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 33.0505617978 85% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 58.6224719101 63% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 12.9106741573 31% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1529.0 2235.4752809 68% => OK
No of words: 302.0 442.535393258 68% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06291390728 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.55969084622 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52969080234 2.79657885939 90% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 215.323595506 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.53642384106 0.4932671777 109% => OK
syllable_count: 479.7 704.065955056 68% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 49.3576734743 60.3974514979 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.9411764706 118.986275619 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7647058824 23.4991977007 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.70588235294 5.21951772744 33% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.312875968298 0.243740707755 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108534698504 0.0831039109588 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.150106581124 0.0758088955206 198% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.20270771617 0.150359130593 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0924513495903 0.0667264976115 139% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 14.1392134831 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 48.8420337079 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.77 12.1639044944 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 100.480337079 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.8971910112 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.