The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
The teaching methods are always a topic of debate as it's difficult to define one general method that fits everyone. The prompt suggests that the best teaching way is to support and praise the good actions and ignore the bad ones. In my opinion, I strongly disagree with the mentioned recommendation for the following two reasons.
First of all, celebrating good actions isn't enough for improving the quality of education and the purpose of a good teaching method is to improve a person's overall educational level. For example, from an educational point, if the teacher in school praises the students for solving a successively certain category of questions and ignores to advise the student to practice on types of questions that he isn't good at then the student's overall skills won't improve. So if the recommended method is applied, the student's educational level will become constant or may decline with time if he starts to ignore to study well as no one will advise him to study.
Secondly, a person's good morals cannot be built without recorrecting the negative actions. For instance, the teacher who acknowledges his student collaboration skill with his friends during the semester projects and ignore the fact that this student cheats in exams, then, This student moral behavior won't improve and at the opposite, he can acquire other bad qualities later as no one tends to advise him.
Someone can argue that bringing the focus to negative actions can make the person disappointed but isn't this the goal of a good teaching method to fix the negative actions and acknowledge the positive action. Overall, The good education method should give care negative as positive in order to improve overall personal qualities and skills.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 40, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
... First of all, celebrating good actions isnt enough for improving the quality of edu...
^^^^
Line 3, column 403, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
... practice on types of questions that he isnt good at then the students overall skill...
^^^^
Line 5, column 11, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a person' or simply 'persons'?
Suggestion: a person; persons
... will advise him to study. Secondly, a persons good morals cannot be built without rec...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 100, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
...ns can make the person disappointed but isnt this the goal of a good teaching method...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, may, second, secondly, so, then, well, for example, for instance, first of all, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 19.5258426966 26% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 33.0505617978 54% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 58.6224719101 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1456.0 2235.4752809 65% => OK
No of words: 287.0 442.535393258 65% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07317073171 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.55969084622 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65476874852 2.79657885939 95% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 215.323595506 73% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.547038327526 0.4932671777 111% => OK
syllable_count: 459.0 704.065955056 65% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 20.2370786517 49% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 23.0359550562 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 73.3954358254 60.3974514979 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.6 118.986275619 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.7 23.4991977007 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.9 5.21951772744 209% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.2758426966 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.162245412272 0.243740707755 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0755852972883 0.0831039109588 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.042930919755 0.0758088955206 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111843009858 0.150359130593 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0483821083974 0.0667264976115 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 14.1392134831 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 48.8420337079 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 12.1743820225 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.72 12.1639044944 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.99 8.38706741573 107% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 100.480337079 72% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 11.2143820225 118% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.