The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
When we teach people, we are trying to make certain knowledge or character an inseparable part of them. Without the ability of animals to teach their younger ones, succession would have been a more difficult phenomena. In the issue that the best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones, I will be taking the position that support the statement to a very reasonable extent for the following reasons below.
Firstly, scientific research have shown that the brain is developed mostly at the very early ages, between 0 to 12 years. This imply that people tend to fully develop most of the traits and behaviour during this period. Which will mean that praising every single good action of people at this age will definitely make the stick with these people. A very good example is a popular health care work at Kiye hospital who decided to be a nurse mainly because of how people cherished her character of always looking out for other sick children during her younger ages.
Secondly, as emotional animals, we tend to engage more on things that will generate endorphin and other feel good hormone. Praising people and massaging their ego is one of the surest route to releasing these hormones. If we concatenate praising people for positive actions and teaching, it will help to encourage humans to do more of the good things because they want people to tell them more of these sweet words and praise. This pattern of teaching is something very common among teachers in the primary schools and it has proven to be a very effective one.
However, there is an addition that will make this method of teaching more effective. Praising people for positive actions will encourage them to do more of the positive things. But our issue also suggest that we should ignore the negative ones. I will say that ignoring negative actions can be very counter productive and can flaw our issue statement a bit. Instead as we praise positive statement, there is also need to castigate the negative ones, so as to discourage people from indulging in them. For instance, a child will never know that throwing stones at adult is totally against good behaviour except you point it out to he/she.
There is also possibilities that people will want to engage more in good behaviour, not for its own sake, but for the admiration and praise they will get. Such situation will defeat the aim of inculcating praise as an element of teaching. Which will definitely be a minus to our issue statement.
In conclusion, in as much as praising people is good for teaching, it will be a more complete issue statement, if we also consider adding punishment for negative actions. Which means that one can consider adjusting the issue statement to “The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and discourage negative ones”.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 221, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Which” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...raits and behaviour during this period. Which will mean that praising every single go...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 75, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... tend to engage more on things that will generate endorphin and other feel good h...
^^
Line 5, column 358, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Instead,
...and can flaw our issue statement a bit. Instead as we praise positive statement, there ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 450, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...so need to castigate the negative ones, so as to discourage people from indulging in the...
^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 239, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Which” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ating praise as an element of teaching. Which will definitely be a minus to our issu...
^^^^^
Line 6, column 278, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... Which will definitely be a minus to our issue statement. In conclusion, in as m...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, look, second, secondly, so, as to, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 12.4196629213 161% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.3162921348 150% => OK
Pronoun: 50.0 33.0505617978 151% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 60.0 58.6224719101 102% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2345.0 2235.4752809 105% => OK
No of words: 485.0 442.535393258 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.83505154639 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.69283662038 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48149790713 2.79657885939 89% => OK
Unique words: 231.0 215.323595506 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.476288659794 0.4932671777 97% => OK
syllable_count: 746.1 704.065955056 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.6375946796 60.3974514979 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.590909091 118.986275619 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0454545455 23.4991977007 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.63636363636 5.21951772744 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 10.2758426966 165% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.254062375529 0.243740707755 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0843918177895 0.0831039109588 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0919356752544 0.0758088955206 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153892324289 0.150359130593 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0793090456035 0.0667264976115 119% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 14.1392134831 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 48.8420337079 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 12.1639044944 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 100.480337079 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.