The real talent of a popular musician cannot accurately be assessed until the musician has been dead for several generations, so that his or her fame does not interfere with honest assessment.
Talent is an ability inherent in a person that makes what he does to appear very appealing and almost perfect to people around him, talent is a very important quality in flourishing in any field, it is always advised that you avoid what you are not talented in. The issue that the real talent of a popular musician cannot accurately bee assessed until the musician has been dead for a several generations is an interesting one. Many may argue in support of the argument, citing reasons like biase and crowd influence etc. But, I will disagree with issue statement for the following reasons I will be explaining below.
Firstly, We need to understand the relationship between talent and fame, being famous means that you have achieved a substantial progress in that particular field you are operating in. This is most apparent in our music industry, no single musician can get to the heyday of their career without talent. How then can we argue that talent cannot be accessed when people are famous? When we know that fame is as a result of talent. A very good example is the pop musician Timaya from Nigeria, his fame is totally attributed to his talent and one can accurated accessed him as a real talent considering the impact of his music about the 1999 military operation in the Niger delta region. Same applies to every other famous musician. They only became famous because their real talent was shinning for all to see.
Secondly, It will be very insensitive for us as human to ignore talents around us and focus on accessing the talents of the dead and gone forever. Shifting our attention to only those that are dead for long will mean that we will miss the oppurtunity of spotting out real talents around us. Eventually, when these people we ignore dies, there will be no assurance that the coming generation is going to consider their impact in the growth of music in the society. Allen Keyman a classical musician and a renowed artist is another good example of why we should not ignore talents around us. His works and contributions to music was never regarded as important till 1991, when archeolist discovered some of his notes and documents where he mapped out what later became standard for that era, the document also contain some of his awards for his contribution to music. Assuming the awards were not rated at that time and properly documented, many of us might never appreciated his contribution. We will not even care now, showing their is a need for talents to be rated during the period their existed.
However, some might argue that in some cases jugement might be baised, this can be true in some cases. But, if we consider Micheal jackson the king of pop, his talent was accurately rated during his life time and is till accurately rated now he is dead and will still remain like that for centuries. Meaning that once the rating is properly done,bais will be defeated completely.
In conclusion, I will say that instead of us to assess talent when musicians are dead for long, we should focus on how to make assessment more accurate during their lifetime. That way we will make a far better judgement
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 394, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'generation'?
Suggestion: generation
...he musician has been dead for a several generations is an interesting one. Many may argue i...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 429, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun may seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much may', 'a good deal of may'.
Suggestion: Much may; A good deal of may
...eral generations is an interesting one. Many may argue in support of the argument, citin...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 115, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eing famous means that you have achieved a substantial progress in that particula...
^^
Line 2, column 117, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'substantial progress'.
Suggestion: substantial progress
...ng famous means that you have achieved a substantial progress in that particular field you are operat...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1028, Rule ID: THEIR_IS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'there'?
Suggestion: there
...ion. We will not even care now, showing their is a need for talents to be rated durin...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 199, Rule ID: LIFE_TIME[1]
Message: Did you mean 'lifetime'?
Suggestion: lifetime
... talent was accurately rated during his life time and is till accurately rated now he is ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 345, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , bais
...ng that once the rating is properly done,bais will be defeated completely. In conclu...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, still, then, in conclusion, as a result, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 33.0 19.5258426966 169% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 25.0 12.4196629213 201% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 23.0 11.3162921348 203% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 70.0 33.0505617978 212% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 67.0 58.6224719101 114% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2590.0 2235.4752809 116% => OK
No of words: 548.0 442.535393258 124% => OK
Chars per words: 4.72627737226 5.05705443957 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.83832613839 4.55969084622 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47546703145 2.79657885939 89% => OK
Unique words: 269.0 215.323595506 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.490875912409 0.4932671777 100% => OK
syllable_count: 833.4 704.065955056 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 6.24550561798 224% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.803051509 60.3974514979 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.608695652 118.986275619 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8260869565 23.4991977007 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.26086956522 5.21951772744 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 7.80617977528 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.335369226724 0.243740707755 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100727934326 0.0831039109588 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.109127169427 0.0758088955206 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.19981530579 0.150359130593 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0653118583756 0.0667264976115 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 14.1392134831 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 48.8420337079 116% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.45 12.1639044944 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 123.0 100.480337079 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.