Best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the
voramendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape tour position.
A balanced approach is required to teach and to learn. A certain degree of negative action has to be tolerated; above which there has to be a repercussion for the action. A good analogy for this would be school or college exams. A good performance would get a good grade analogous to praise; a moderate performance would get a moderate grade analogous to ignorance; a bad performance would give the student a failure grade analogous to punishment. Here a certain amount of negative performance is tolerated, below which the student is punished.
Applying policies such as praising positive actions and ignoring negative actions in schools would lead to ridiculous situations. According to it, misbehaviour and tantrums of unruly students are not supposed to be punished and have to be ignored; only the good behaviour of obedient children have to be praised. This would make the children think they could behave in an undesirable manner and not have any consequences to it. The obedient students would feel that the incentives for good behaviour are less.
Dogs have been trained to learn tricks based on reinforcement learning techniques. Studies based on them have shown that praising i.e. positive reinforcement is more effective than punishing negative behaviour, i.e. is negative reinforcement, individually. But the total lack of negative reinforcement would not help the learner understand their mistakes. The mistake done would be soon forgotten; there is a chance of its recurrence. If negative actions are tolerated, this would build false confidence that they could get away with anything without consequences. Hence only an unacceptable amount of bad behaviour would have to be punished after ignoring minor ones.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 172, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...as to be a repercussion for the action. A good analogy for this would be school o...
^
Line 1, column 230, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... this would be school or college exams. A good performance would get a good grade...
^
Line 3, column 367, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an undesirable manner" with adverb for "undesirable"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ke the children think they could behave in an undesirable manner and not have any consequences to it. Th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 566, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...way with anything without consequences. Hence only an unacceptable amount of bad beha...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... punished after ignoring minor ones.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, if, so, as to, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 14.8657303371 47% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 33.0505617978 42% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 58.6224719101 53% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1474.0 2235.4752809 66% => OK
No of words: 274.0 442.535393258 62% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.3795620438 5.05705443957 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.55969084622 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01737204735 2.79657885939 108% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 215.323595506 67% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.525547445255 0.4932671777 107% => OK
syllable_count: 467.1 704.065955056 66% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.9673461772 60.3974514979 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.2666666667 118.986275619 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2666666667 23.4991977007 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.26666666667 5.21951772744 43% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.97078651685 60% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 10.2758426966 19% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 5.13820224719 234% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.108848729924 0.243740707755 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0468664402552 0.0831039109588 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0528603687515 0.0758088955206 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0788373937477 0.150359130593 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00402707971251 0.0667264976115 6% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 14.1392134831 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 48.8420337079 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 12.1639044944 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.16 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 100.480337079 63% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.