Luck plays more of a role in determining success than work ethic does.
The relationship between luck, work ethics and success are not as simplistic as they seem. Depending on the interpretation success, luck and work ethics play varying role. Success may be interpreted in two ways. Firstly, if one meets his goals and flawlessly completes the given task, he can be deemed really successful. Secondly, if his exploits are recognised and validated by other people, he can be called popularly successful. Purely work ethics pave the way for one to be really successful . But to be recognised and acknowledged, and then deemed popularly successful, he will need a little bit of luck.
There are many instances in history, where scientists made great discoveries and inventions. It is obvious that everyone had great discipline in the pursual of their goal. They must have displayed enormous amount of work ethics because of the the precise nature of science. But not everyone was equally acknowledged for their contributions. Many died in obscurity without fame. For these men probably luck was not in their fate. Hence they were not deemed popularly successful, but even though they were 'really' successfull at achieving their goal.
Popular success is the second kind of success. It requires acknowledgement and appreciation by the fellow men and women for the work done. Apart from work ethics, certain amount of luck is necessary for this kind of success. An office may have many hard working employees. Inspite of many being equally good, depending on the persuasion of his or her manager for the award, he may or may not get the best employee award. In this situation one is deemed successful while another equally good guy is ignored.
A unfortunate circumstance may occur where credit goes to the wrong person. Due to pure luck a person may be deemed successful. This is an instance of popluar success, where work ethics does not matter.
Success is a difficult term to fit it into a certain framework of meaning. Success at a deeper level is achieving one's goal. Work ethics is the only thing matters to achieve this. But for popular success which comes from recognition of one achieving one's goal, requires a certain amount of luck. Popular success is superficial and short lived. Luck is needed to maintain it. But real success thrives only on work ethic.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-10-05 | Haymide | 54 | view |
| 2021-08-01 | Geet@3 | 58 | view |
| 2021-07-30 | Sumanayana | 50 | view |
| 2021-07-30 | Sumanayana | 54 | view |
| 2021-07-16 | Himanshi Rana | 50 | view |
- Best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the voramendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and supporti 50
- The following appeared in a memorandum from the owner of Movies Galore a chain of video rental stores In order to reverse the recent decline in our profits we must reduce operating expenses at Movies Galore s ten video rental stores Since we are famous fo 45
- Luck plays more of a role in determining success than work ethic does 50
- In a laboratory study of two different industrial cleansers CleanAll was found to remove 40 more dirt and kill 30 more bacteria than the next best cleanser Furthermore a study showed that employees working at buildings cleaned with CleanAll used far fewer 68
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 451, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...popularly successful. Purely work ethics pave the way for one to be really succes...
^^
Line 1, column 497, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... the way for one to be really successful . But to be recognised and acknowledged, ...
^^
Line 1, column 592, Rule ID: LITTLE_BIT[1]
Message: Reduce redundancy by using 'little' or 'bit'.
Suggestion: little; bit
...ed popularly successful, he will need a little bit of luck. There are many instances in...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 240, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
...ormous amount of work ethics because of the the precise nature of science. But not ever...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 240, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
...ormous amount of work ethics because of the the precise nature of science. But not ever...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 430, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...en probably luck was not in their fate. Hence they were not deemed popularly successf...
^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'An' instead of 'A' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: An
... another equally good guy is ignored. A unfortunate circumstance may occur wher...
^
Line 7, column 114, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
... Success at a deeper level is achieving ones goal. Work ethics is the only thing mat...
^^^^
Line 7, column 250, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...comes from recognition of one achieving ones goal, requires a certain amount of luck...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, hence, if, may, really, second, secondly, so, then, while, apart from, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 19.5258426966 128% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 33.0505617978 79% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 58.6224719101 67% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1916.0 2235.4752809 86% => OK
No of words: 383.0 442.535393258 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.00261096606 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.42384287591 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75630590142 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 215.323595506 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.516971279373 0.4932671777 105% => OK
syllable_count: 590.4 704.065955056 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.77640449438 338% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 30.0 20.2370786517 148% => OK
Sentence length: 12.0 23.0359550562 52% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.6439638784 60.3974514979 47% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 63.8666666667 118.986275619 54% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 12.7666666667 23.4991977007 54% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 3.3 5.21951772744 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 7.80617977528 115% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 24.0 10.2758426966 234% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.285165496986 0.243740707755 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.091131915032 0.0831039109588 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.104023846173 0.0758088955206 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166767048763 0.150359130593 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0683675682611 0.0667264976115 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.5 14.1392134831 60% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.76 48.8420337079 139% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 12.1743820225 56% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 10.83 12.1639044944 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.86 8.38706741573 94% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 100.480337079 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.8971910112 63% => OK
gunning_fog: 6.8 11.2143820225 61% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.