The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree ordisagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the positionyou take. In developing and supp

Essay topics:

The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones.

Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or

disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position

you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific

circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be

advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.

Ignoring wrong actions would lead to repeating these actions. Praising right actions for too much might also lead to arrogance and thus, failure is inevitable.

From my experience during university, extracurricular activities and also at work, it is already proven that, a known and balanced system of reward and punishment without biasing is the most efficient methodology for reaching the optimal results.

Although ignoring negative actions might in some situations be the right decision, avoiding negative or wrong actions generally is only a build-up of a greater more fatal actions. On the other hand, too much criticism is a clear reason for not only disappointment, but also for dismantling productivity and destroying the willing to learn. Thus, achieving ultimate results and efficiency of learners in a school or a university, can be through constructive criticism to any unignorable negative action. Constructive criticism depends on facts rather than opinions, on reasons for mistakes rather than results of these mistakes and finally, a gentle advice to solve the problem once and for all and ensuring that this problem will not happen anyhow again.

Punishment for every tiny mistake could have severe consequences. Despite that, it is required sometimes in severe negative actions to clarify the seriousness of the action and to make straightforward example to every student that, such actions are not tolerable. So, all students will do as much as they can to avoid this mistake, as they know its consequences. Although punishment can be useful for the education process, it must be fair and unbiased to ensure its effectiveness. It also must be proportional to the severity of the action.

A reward system guarantees not only that positive actions will continue but also encourages other team members to these actions. Unlike punishment, praising could have more disastrous effect on especially teenager students, who can be easily arrogant and shortsighted. Another important thing about rewarding is that, ignoring those, whom are trying and giving their best to get a reward but without reaching a sufficient level, might lead them to disappointment and could have also a negative effect on the class.

All in all, balanced and cautious reward and punishment system is required in order to achieve the optimal results and the best way of teaching. Fair punishment and non-biased rewarding system ensure that, the learner would do his best efforts to avoid mistakes and try to give everything he can, to get rewards.

Votes
Average: 6.6 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 641, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'gentle advice'.
Suggestion: gentle advice
... results of these mistakes and finally, a gentle advice to solve the problem once and for all a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, if, so, thus, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 12.4196629213 145% => OK
Conjunction : 24.0 14.8657303371 161% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 33.0505617978 79% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 58.6224719101 75% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2159.0 2235.4752809 97% => OK
No of words: 403.0 442.535393258 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35732009926 5.05705443957 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48049772903 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93001573563 2.79657885939 105% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 215.323595506 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.501240694789 0.4932671777 102% => OK
syllable_count: 668.7 704.065955056 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.6527925629 60.3974514979 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.0 118.986275619 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7058823529 23.4991977007 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.21951772744 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.2758426966 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 5.13820224719 214% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.123582005163 0.243740707755 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0450244166475 0.0831039109588 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0250851938642 0.0758088955206 33% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0657246267233 0.150359130593 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0317374332019 0.0667264976115 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 14.1392134831 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 48.8420337079 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.1743820225 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.1639044944 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.38706741573 106% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 100.480337079 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.