Some people say that the best way to improve public health is by increasing the number of sports facilities. Other, however, say that this would have little effect on public health and that other measures are required.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Providing sports facilities such as gyms, fitness halls, running passages or swimming pools may or may not contribute to the gross enhancement of public health, because public health depends not only on sports facilities but also on other factors.
Boosting public health requires assiduous efforts. Initially, the current status of public health must be determined through practical data from hospitals and health centers. Next, evaluating and analyzing these facts and comparing them with the desired level. For instance, a community without obesity. Subsequently, clear objectives are created, based on them, the main reasons for the actual level of public health can be concluded. Thus, solutions such as providing more sports facilities might be needed. Generally, applying solutions such as this, without any reasoning, researching or having a solid ground, is actually a waste of both time and resources.
In many cases, the availability of sports facilities boosted sports activities, which amended public health as a result. Albeit it is necessary to fight obesity -which an instance potential target-, more sports establishments do not ensure the overall amendment of public health. Because there are many possible reasons, explaining a deteriorating level of public health regarding obesity. Such as a plague, that has hit every corner in the country, malnutrition, which is currently present in many middle-eastern countries, whose children are already overweight, or possibly lack of awareness, though people might have many sports institutions, they do not have the mentality of daily physical activities, making sports promotions and advertising of its importance much more efficient and cheaper than offering facilities.
All in all, increasing sports facilities proved to be an indecisive factor in public health. Any other general solution, that is applied without careful study, would also be inconclusive, as long as there is no obvious reasons of the problem behind the current condition of public health.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, may, regarding, so, thus, for instance, such as, as a result, in many cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1730.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 306.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.65359477124 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91631467457 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.607843137255 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 522.9 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 96.3125227622 49.4020404114 195% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.571428571 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8571428571 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.85714285714 7.06120827912 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.278953088184 0.244688304435 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100281551101 0.084324248473 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0545281404655 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.178634032667 0.151304729494 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0137160954677 0.056905535591 24% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.0946893788 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.49 12.4159519038 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.63 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.