The best way to understand the character of a society is to examine the character of the men and women that the society chooses as its heroes or its role models.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim

Essay topics:

The best way to understand the character of a society is to examine the character of the men and women that the society chooses as its heroes or its role models.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.

It is not eccentric to argue that in the world, we live, knowing the characteristics of the community is a debatable issue among people. While some people think that there are some indicators such as socio-economic and cultural index that determine unique society characteristics, other believe the assessing the traits of the society’ heroes is the best way to know the special society characteristic. in my view, I mostly agree with the first statements because of two reasons.
First of all, the society heroes or models are the representatives for the special groups in the community, not the whole residents which are lived in that community. That is, some clique in every society like juveniles or the children want to have and follow their unique heroes, whereas the rest of the residents are not eager to have a model or hero. Hence, the heroes or models only could be used as an indication to demonstrate parts of the community traits. Also, most of the people who are adherent of unique heroes choose their heroes by watching TV or Shows Programs, and there are some groups in the society such as adults or senile that do not have free time to watch these type of the entertainments, or they are not keen to watch these programs. Therefore, the heroes or models only could show particular parts of the society residents’ peoples.
Further, knowing heroes or models could not be used as a costly way to demonstrate society traits. To clarify this point, accessing famous heroes or models is an arduous issue since they are itinerants people. Take an example, Batman who is the heroes of the children are busy with different kinds of kids’ programs and asking him to allocate time to interview require to pay money for him. Besides, most of the heroes or modes are peripatetic, so everyone who wants to know these people completely forces to accompany them from one city or place to another. For instance, Angelia Jully who is the model and artist spends her time in different countries such as the middle east, to help poor and homeless people. Consequently, spending much time and money is mandatory to know the traits of heroes or models.
Although using heroes as a valid indicator of the unique society characteristic is a problematic issue, it could be used as the best way to know the characteristics of special groups of in society.
All in all, while some people think that using celebrities as a way to know characteristics of the society is the logical idea, I disagree with this issue as heroes or models could not be used as representative of the whole residents of the society and knowing these people is not an economic idea.

Votes
Average: 5 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 409, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...now the special society characteristic. in my view, I mostly agree with the first ...
^^
Line 3, column 374, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'paying'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'require' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: paying
...m to allocate time to interview require to pay money for him. Besides, most of the her...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 511, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'accompanying'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'force' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: accompanying
... to know these people completely forces to accompany them from one city or place to another....
^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, consequently, first, hence, if, so, therefore, whereas, while, for instance, such as, first of all, in my view

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 19.5258426966 128% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 12.4196629213 40% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 14.8657303371 148% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 33.0505617978 82% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 58.6224719101 96% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 12.9106741573 15% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2216.0 2235.4752809 99% => OK
No of words: 458.0 442.535393258 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8384279476 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.62611441266 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.844243287 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 215.323595506 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.434497816594 0.4932671777 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 718.2 704.065955056 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 23.0359550562 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 68.6481063104 60.3974514979 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.5 118.986275619 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.625 23.4991977007 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.8125 5.21951772744 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.160687428519 0.243740707755 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0601974876509 0.0831039109588 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0413977824449 0.0758088955206 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104448837749 0.150359130593 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0206847771001 0.0667264976115 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 14.1392134831 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 48.8420337079 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 12.1743820225 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.38 12.1639044944 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 100.480337079 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.8971910112 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 11.2143820225 118% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.