If a goal is worthy, then any means taken to attain it are justifiable.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
It is not eccentric to debate that in the world, we live, accessing to an especially invaluable goal by any means is a controversial issue among people. While some people think that the object does not justify means, others oppose this idea. In my view, I mostly agree with the idea that when a goal is worthwhile it is logical to use any tools to achieve it because of two reasons.
First of all, using any means to access essential goals leads to essential positive results, and preventing detrimental problems which will be resulted in the lack of this goal. That is, by achieving any important goal everyone could access some profits and also avoid some detrimental results. For example, in nuclear negotiation among Iran and the other six countries, five European countries and Unites states, these countries reach to a nuclear dealer in spite of having opposites viewpoints in some aspects. Iran and the other six countries have so different points about most of the issues. In facts, these countries wanted to prevent some detrimental results such as accessing to atomic bombs or initiating atomic competition all over the world. Moreover, sometimes accessing valuable goals brings more benefits to most of the people and community, so using every tool to achieve it is admittable. To explain more, former Unites stated president “Abraham Lincoln” signed freedom of slavery in all over the united states especially in the western parts of the countries to associate North and was the province and avoiding from internal war. “I did not disagree with the slavery system in the USA, but I abolish it because of preserving Unity around the country”, said Lincoln
Further, using various means to access worthy goal is a pragmatic and helpful method as compared with use well-knowد or traditional ways to get this goal. To clarify this point, every goal has its way to achieve it, yet some time some people or societies could not or are not eager to use these kinds of the means to achieve this goal, so using different and even unacceptable way in this conditions is a warrantable issue. For example, some people are fatty, and they want to lose their extra weight by the use of surgery ways which are more side effects as compared with the usual methods such as exercise and decreasing body calories. In this scenario, Surgical operations have been done on these type of the people to contracts their Gastrointestinal system which is so high risks and hectic operation. Since some overweight people are not keen to exercise or do not have enough time to exercise or take a regime, they accept the risks of this operation to reduce their body weight.
Although reaching invaluable goals justify its means, this does not mean that every tool in every condition could be used to access this goal. To explain more, is it logical to get Millionaire by the use of corruptions? Or is it rational to be a leader of a particular country by killing most of the innocuous people?
In summary, while some people think that using any means to achieve worthy goals is not acceptable, I disagree with this idea due to avoiding detrimental conditions which will be produced when could not success to get this goal, and also use various methods to access valuable goals is more conducive as compared with the using only one way.
- Students should always question what they are taught instead of accepting it passively.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing a 66
- The following appeared in an editorial in a local newspaper."Commuters complain that increased rush-hour traffic on Blue Highway between the suburbs and the city center has doubled their commuting time. The favored proposal of the motorists' lobby is to w 82
- The following appeared in a memo from the director of student housing at Buckingham College."To serve the housing needs of our students, Buckingham College should build a number of new dormitories. Buckingham's enrollment is growing and, based on current 89
- The following appeared as a letter to the editor of a national newspaper."Your recent article on corporate downsizing* in Elthyria maintains that the majority of competent workers who have lost jobs as a result of downsizing face serious economic hardship 86
- The following appeared in a letter to the editor of a journal on environmental issues."Over the past year, the Crust Copper Company (CCC) has purchased over 10,000 square miles of land in the tropical nation of West Fredonia. Mining copper on this land wi 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 385, Rule ID: THIS_NNS
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
... different and even unacceptable way in this conditions is a warrantable issue. For ...
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, moreover, so, well, while, for example, in fact, in summary, such as, first of all, in my view, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 19.5258426966 118% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 23.0 14.8657303371 155% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 33.0505617978 130% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 81.0 58.6224719101 138% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2776.0 2235.4752809 124% => OK
No of words: 568.0 442.535393258 128% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88732394366 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.88187981987 4.55969084622 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63987540884 2.79657885939 94% => OK
Unique words: 261.0 215.323595506 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.459507042254 0.4932671777 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 890.1 704.065955056 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.77640449438 338% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 10.0 4.38483146067 228% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 29.0 23.0359550562 126% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 72.7290345417 60.3974514979 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 146.105263158 118.986275619 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.8947368421 23.4991977007 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.78947368421 5.21951772744 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 5.13820224719 175% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.118579043491 0.243740707755 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0430306159476 0.0831039109588 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0386748365988 0.0758088955206 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0823641708818 0.150359130593 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0225692977297 0.0667264976115 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
automated_readability_index: 16.5 14.1392134831 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.04 48.8420337079 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 12.1743820225 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 12.1639044944 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 123.0 100.480337079 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 11.2143820225 121% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.