Some people believe it is often necessary, even desirable, for political leaders to withhold information from the public. Others believe that the public has a right to be fully informed.Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns

Essay topics:

Some people believe it is often necessary, even desirable, for political leaders to withhold information from the public. Others believe that the public has a right to be fully informed.
Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns with your own position and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should address both of the views presented.

It is not eccentric to debate that in the world, we live, accessing the information by public people is a controversial issue among people. While some people think that those governors keep public from courant information to save their positions, others believe that people have the right to be informed about their society news and events. In my view, I mostly agree with the latest statement because of two reasons.
First of all, providing more information for the public by the political authorities is the best ways for a politician to be prosperous in their filed. That is, political rulers, require general supports and votes to be elected in the following political competitions, so when they are franks with their people, they could attract general trust. For example, the United States former president Reagan, who was accused to obscure the truth about McFarland issue, lost his trust among unites state, and in the following political competition. Moreover, being honest with general and allow people to access free information leads to weakening political adversaries. For instance, if the ruler does not allow people to access information, public try to obtain information from other data sources like political rulers’ enemy mass media or propaganda, so the political rulers losing their popularity among people over the time.
To clarify this point, when public being updated they could be informed about recent events like political, social, economic, and science in the society, and by this way, they could improve their knowledge about universal and local contemporary issues. For instance, thanks to some internets social networks such as Twitters, Facebooks, or Telegram everyone could critique social problems and send their viewpoints for their rulers and other people. Therefore, everybody in most of the countries could be informed about their community’s events by the use of these networks. Also, there are other beneficial effects of accessing free information for the public. To explain more, because of advancing some jobs networks such as Linkedin, Reserchgates, most pf the adept peoples in every field could connect to improve their knowledge.
Although the governor had better allow the public to access free information, there is some limitation about this issues. To be more precise, if rulers give every information about every aspect of the community, it will be dangerous for society as a whole. For instance, rulers should be cautious about internal security, and also about most of the company’s security. If rulers provide more information about cites topics, it leads to some criminal events, and some chicanery people want to theft important information from these kinds of places.
In summary, while some people think that political rulers should be frugal about giving more and free information for the public, I disagree with this idea due accessing for additional and free information is better for the political rulers and

Average: 6.6 (1 vote)
Essay Categories


Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 110, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...rmation, there is some limitation about this issues. To be more precise, if rulers g...

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, moreover, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in summary, such as, first of all, in my view

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 34.0 33.0505617978 103% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 58.6224719101 109% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 12.9106741573 155% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2521.0 2235.4752809 113% => OK
No of words: 470.0 442.535393258 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.36382978723 5.05705443957 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.65612321451 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7275077131 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 232.0 215.323595506 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.493617021277 0.4932671777 100% => OK
syllable_count: 794.7 704.065955056 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.10617977528 258% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 6.0 1.77640449438 338% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.3279221792 60.3974514979 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.055555556 118.986275619 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.1111111111 23.4991977007 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.72222222222 5.21951772744 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.263552496441 0.243740707755 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101890053234 0.0831039109588 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0621316062373 0.0758088955206 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.181152254696 0.150359130593 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0371150706469 0.0667264976115 56% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 14.1392134831 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 48.8420337079 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 12.1743820225 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.1639044944 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.38706741573 105% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 100.480337079 114% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?


Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.