The effectiveness of a country's leaders is best measured by examining the well-being of that country's citizens.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
It is not eccentric to debate that in the world, in which we live, assessing effectiveness of country’s leader is a controversial issue among people. While some people think that there are political and military features which makes a leader efficacious, others believe that country’s’ citizen well-being is one of the fundamental indicators of a prosperous leader. In my view, I mostly agree with the latest statement because of two reasons.
First of all, peoples’ quality of life has been affected directly by their ruler dictum or strategy. People’s economic status has important effects on their quality of life. For instance, when people have enough money, they could go to everywhere they want to spend their free time, or they could provide every refreshing food such as different fruits or vegetable. Also, there are some methods that estimate people quality of life by measuring their economic status. To explain more, by the means of some statistical survey in the society, expert could estimate country’s people well-being. For example, there are special counting in some country which are done every ten or five years and assessing peoples’ economic ability. In this condition, statistical adroit could estimate people well-being by measuring their economic ability to afford some daily life requirement such as house, cars, different type of foods, and etc. this estimation have been conducted by the government, and do not require sophisticated devices or technology. It also is a fast way to collect people economic and geographic information. In fact, by this method, experts could gather people attitude about their quality of life.
Further, leader have direct effects on people health, which is essential in public well—being, by selection proper minister in the appropriate positions. To clarify this point, when country’s people suffer from various kinds of health problems, which influence on their quality of life, this means that country’s leader could not select appropriate persons to these positions, so public have been affected by inappropriate policies which are impose by the persons in the cited positons. For example, because of dictating mistakes policies by the health ministers-which are selected by the leaders- people could not access to medicine care and preventive centers to detect their maladies. Therefore, some of the people who are suffering from undetectable diseases such as hypertension may realize their disease in the final stages, and in this phase their kidney has been devastating by their hypertension. In fact, in this scenario, patient have to pay more money to treat their hypertension besides their kidney anomaly. Is it logical to expect that the person who has different type of diseases has a better quality of life?
Although leader plays important role on selecting proper persons for having responsibilities in the governments, the governments ministers may be intransigent to accept leader dictums after they obtained positions, and they will be mavericks in the futures, hence, by deterring rulers’ policies, the minister may impose their policies on the societies, so peoples’ life have been affected by their mistakes strategies.
In summary, while some people think that there are other important factors -except leader- which influence on people quality of life, I disagree with this idea since leader have direct impacts on peoples’ well-being by means of influencing on their economic status and health.
|2020-01-19||sapana||50||Read full essay|
|2020-01-12||shuocurity||66||Read full essay|
|2019-10-29||priyanayak||66||Read full essay|
|2019-10-17||yesh||50||Read full essay|
|2019-10-02||Dikshaa_007||50||Read full essay|
- The following appeared in a letter from a firm providing investment advice to a client."Homes in the northeastern United States, where winters are typically cold, have traditionally used oil as their major fuel for heating. Last year that region experienc39
- A recently issued twenty year study on headaches suffered by the residents of Mentia investigated the possible therapeutic effect of consuming salicylates Salicylates are members of the same chemical family as aspirin a medicine used to treat headaches Al67
- It is more important to read or watch news presented by people whose views are different from your own than it is to read or watch news presented by those whose views are similar to your own73
- Because the world is changing so quickly people now are less happy or less satisfied with their lives than people were in the past73
- The surest indicator of a great nation is represented not by the achievements of its rulers, artists, or scientists, but by the general welfare of its people.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statemen66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 939, Rule ID: AND_ETC
Message: Use simply 'etc.'.
...s house, cars, different type of foods, and etc. this estimation have been conducted by ...
Line 3, column 452, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'imposed'.
...ted by inappropriate policies which are impose by the persons in the cited positons. F...
Line 3, column 709, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE
Message: Simply use 'some'.
...rs to detect their maladies. Therefore, some of the people who are suffering from undetecta...
Line 5, column 282, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
...ng on their economic status and health.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, hence, if, may, so, therefore, well, while, for example, for instance, in fact, in summary, such as, first of all, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 19.5258426966 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 11.3162921348 168% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 33.0505617978 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 82.0 58.6224719101 140% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3001.0 2235.4752809 134% => OK
No of words: 544.0 442.535393258 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.51654411765 5.05705443957 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.82947280553 4.55969084622 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04138070963 2.79657885939 109% => OK
Unique words: 261.0 215.323595506 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.479779411765 0.4932671777 97% => OK
syllable_count: 934.2 704.065955056 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.77640449438 281% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 14.0 4.38483146067 319% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 90.3877010878 60.3974514979 150% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.904761905 118.986275619 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.9047619048 23.4991977007 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.21951772744 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.148420873288 0.243740707755 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.057057519707 0.0831039109588 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0528406682325 0.0758088955206 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113271028501 0.150359130593 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.054434799794 0.0667264976115 82% => OK
automated_readability_index: 17.5 14.1392134831 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 48.8420337079 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 12.1743820225 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.03 12.1639044944 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.88 8.38706741573 106% => OK
difficult_words: 138.0 100.480337079 137% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.