The effectiveness of a country's leaders is best measured by examining the well-being of that country's citizens.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
All the people living in a country are 'what the country represents'. it is the people who make a country, the most accurate measurement of where a country stands. I completely agree with the statement that to measure the effectiveness of a country's leaders, it is best to check the well-being of the country's citizens. I am going to put forth a couple of reasons for the same.
Firstly, even the best of us tend to forget that we, the common people, are the center of attention of every leader. we have given them their posts and their job is to uplift the poor in our country and develop the country as a whole, not just a particular demographic. In countries where leaders have assimilated this fact, it is quite clear from the average per capita income and quality of life standards how effective the country's leaders have been. For instance, if a country undergoes a change of leadership, to see if the new government is more effective than the previous one, we must look at the well-being of the people. if the quality of life has increased it easily results in increased hygiene and well-being.
Secondly, it has been shown that well-being is a direct marker for work efficiency and personal betterment. The term 'well-being' comprises of a plethora of factors like mental health, physical health, and happiness, only to name a few. if a country's leaders are working effectively and with good motives, these factors would gradually increase in the public leading to the upliftment of the country as a whole, not just the individual.
However, many people might argue that instead of well-being, we should measure the GDP (or any other factor) of the country to quantify the effectiveness of the leaders. To which, I would like to ask, isn't the well-being of a person the ultimate factor responsible for everything else, even GDP? For example, if a person is sick he won't go to work or if he does, he would perform sub-optimally, either of which in-turn affects the throughput of his workplace, which ultimately affects the gdp of a country itself. So, in conclusion, everything in a country is closely tied to the people residing in it. And a leader's metric for effectiveness and functionality should be the 'well-being' of the people in his/her country.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 69, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...ountry are what the country represents. it is the people who make a country, the m...
^^
Line 4, column 118, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: We
...he center of attention of every leader. we have given them their posts and their j...
^^
Line 4, column 632, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: If
...t look at the well-being of the people. if the quality of life has increased it ea...
^^
Line 7, column 129, Rule ID: COMPRISES_OF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'comprises' or 'consists of'?
Suggestion: comprises; consists of
...ersonal betterment. The term well-being comprises of a plethora of factors like mental healt...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 236, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: If
...lth, and happiness, only to name a few. if a countrys leaders are working effectiv...
^^
Line 10, column 200, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
...leaders. To which, I would like to ask, isnt the well-being of a person the ultimate...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, look, second, secondly, so, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.5258426966 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 33.0505617978 94% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 58.6224719101 87% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1879.0 2235.4752809 84% => OK
No of words: 390.0 442.535393258 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.81794871795 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44391917772 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86208178832 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 215.323595506 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.507692307692 0.4932671777 103% => OK
syllable_count: 576.9 704.065955056 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 6.24550561798 192% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.1416839107 60.3974514979 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.529411765 118.986275619 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9411764706 23.4991977007 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.05882352941 5.21951772744 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.332853390351 0.243740707755 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111477916554 0.0831039109588 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0780027019071 0.0758088955206 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.211220725775 0.150359130593 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0615423761133 0.0667264976115 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 14.1392134831 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 48.8420337079 118% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 12.1639044944 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 100.480337079 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.