The effectiveness of a country's leaders is best measured by examining the well-being of that country's citizens.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
One of the surest indicator of progress for a country is having efficacious leaders. Under effective leadership a country can prosper in every way possible and reach the pinnacle of success. But no leader can be effective without taking care of the people he or she leads. According to the prompt, effectiveness of a leader is determined by how well the common people are doing. I mostly agree with this idea for two main reasons.
Firstly, no leadership can remain stable for longer time without taking care of the people it leads. If common people are neglected by the leaders, it becomes just a matter of time before the people subvert the leaders and choose a new one. We can see this happening in history several times. We can look at French revolution. In 18th century, France was lead by nobility who neglected its common people. People were dying in street from hunger while the nobility held parties. History shows what happened next. French revolution not only overthrew the leadership headed by the nobility, but also created a violent atmosphere where common people were killing nobles. This case of ineffective leadership resulting from negligence of the common people followed by being overthrown by the people is pretty common in history. Thus it can be said, if the well-being of the country's citizens are not taken care off, then the leadership of the country is not effective.
Moreover, just and concientous leaders make the well being of the general people the priority. History elucidates us with numerous examples of such leaderships. Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman, after the liberation war of 1971 in Bangladesh, made the common people's well being the priority. He contacted various international sources and urged them to send relief for the then war torn Bangladesh. He himself made sure people get the help they need. In doing so, he became the most venerated leader in the whole country's history. Similarly, we can see Abraham Lincoln, who realized the central problem of the people of his country, and deligitimized slavery. Under his leadership the whole United States became torn from the civil war. But as he put the common people's benefit before the elite ones, he didn't hesitate to go on the war against slavery and eventually winning it. Thus, history shows us that, great leaders go at any length to make sure of well being of the common people.
One can argue that, dictatorial leadership often lead a nation in a very high position in the world. While the argument has some truth, history shows us that no nation is stable under such leaderships. We can look at mongolia, united under Gengis Khan it captured a vast region of the world. But as Gengis was an imperialist who did not care about the common people, his empire periled after his death. Similar fate was faced by many of the other such nations including Hitler's Germany and Mussolini's Italy. Under autocratic leadership, people's betterment is often neglected and repudiated as unimportant. According to the history of the world, no nation had ever been in a good position under such leadership. Thus we can say, if the leaders of a country doesn't take care of the people, it is not effective.
Effectiveness of leaderships in governing a country is very much dependent on the leader's compassion for the people he or she leads. Effective leaders can lead the country to the pinnacle of success.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 823, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...the people is pretty common in history. Thus it can be said, if the well-being of th...
^^^^
Line 5, column 388, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hem to send relief for the then war torn Bangladesh. He himself made sure people ...
^^
Line 5, column 807, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...oples benefit before the elite ones, he didnt hesitate to go on the war against slave...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 712, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
... a good position under such leadership. Thus we can say, if the leaders of a country...
^^^^
Line 7, column 757, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...we can say, if the leaders of a country doesnt take care of the people, it is not effe...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 83, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'leaders'' or 'leader's'?
Suggestion: leaders'; leader's
...a country is very much dependent on the leaders compassion for the people he or she lea...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, look, moreover, similarly, so, then, thus, well, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 19.5258426966 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 38.0 33.0505617978 115% => OK
Preposition: 75.0 58.6224719101 128% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2838.0 2235.4752809 127% => OK
No of words: 574.0 442.535393258 130% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94425087108 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.89472135074 4.55969084622 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64354094131 2.79657885939 95% => OK
Unique words: 272.0 215.323595506 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.473867595819 0.4932671777 96% => OK
syllable_count: 890.1 704.065955056 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 6.24550561798 208% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.77640449438 281% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 35.0 20.2370786517 173% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 23.0359550562 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.5349627802 60.3974514979 52% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 81.0857142857 118.986275619 68% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.4 23.4991977007 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.42857142857 5.21951772744 47% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 16.0 5.13820224719 311% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.107974997912 0.243740707755 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0348487229027 0.0831039109588 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0460318526193 0.0758088955206 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0912037785196 0.150359130593 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0544281946943 0.0667264976115 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 14.1392134831 71% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 48.8420337079 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 12.1639044944 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.84 8.38706741573 93% => OK
difficult_words: 124.0 100.480337079 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.8971910112 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.2143820225 75% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.