The best way to understand the character of a society is to examine the character of the men and women that the society chooses as its heroes or its role models.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
Traits of the society are represented by idols or prominent leaders because the people usually conform to their ideas and actions. Nevertheless, it would be incoherent to asseverate that these representative characters present distinct cultures of the society, let alone the society as a whole.
Admittedly, national idols may represent the characters of a culture because they hold within themselves the wishes, trends, and notions of the people of the era. For instance, Da Vinci could be held as the most important figure of the Renaissance era due to his countless discoveries and inventions. His inquiry into various fields such as art, music, biology, mechanics present the notion of the time as full of curiosity and a craving for a prolific culture: without the understanding of Da Vinci, we would not be able to grasp the characters of that time of history.
Nonetheless, due to globalization it has become difficult to understand the distinctive traits of a society by only scrutinizing the idols of such groups. Since the transactions between global leaders are not an anomaly, the representatives tend to learn from each other and try to adapt the propitious traits of the other. For instance, Jay Park a Korean famous hip hop artist, is close friends with Jay-Z and they cooperate and exchange ideas about music, thus resulting in similar style of hip hop in both countries because they both lead the music trend in each of their countries. Also, the current Korean president Moon, is famous for adapting the actions of president Obama and his eloquence. Hence, because of globalization, and leaders imitating each other, they no longer can represent distinct characters of the nation.
Furthermore, it would be unsound to argue that a leader represents the society as a whole. Especially political leader, however famous and popular, always possess opposing factions. From a foreigner's point of view, the opposition's ideas and characters are cloaked by the leaders stance and thus will never be able to understand the overall background of the nation. For instance, President Rho, a former Korean president, was revered by many because of his endeavor to clean the corrupted police force. However, he also faced many opposition due to his faulty economic policies and if one simply looks at him as a national idol, it would be impossible to grasp the economic and political situation Korea was in at that time.
In conclusion, even though icons may represent some traits of the nation, due to globalization and opposition, a single figure cannot represent all the characters of a society.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 273, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'leaders'' or 'leader's'?
Suggestion: leaders'; leader's
...ideas and characters are cloaked by the leaders stance and thus will never be able to u...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 528, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun opposition seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much opposition', 'a good deal of opposition'.
Suggestion: much opposition; a good deal of opposition
...ed police force. However, he also faced many opposition due to his faulty economic policies and...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, hence, however, if, look, may, nevertheless, nonetheless, so, thus, for instance, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.3162921348 35% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 33.0505617978 73% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 58.6224719101 99% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2193.0 2235.4752809 98% => OK
No of words: 425.0 442.535393258 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54043259262 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91985115988 2.79657885939 104% => OK
Unique words: 225.0 215.323595506 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.529411764706 0.4932671777 107% => OK
syllable_count: 691.2 704.065955056 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.9791240975 60.3974514979 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.0625 118.986275619 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.5625 23.4991977007 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.6875 5.21951772744 147% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0804187492392 0.243740707755 33% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0316159463979 0.0831039109588 38% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0290334139227 0.0758088955206 38% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0527978047529 0.150359130593 35% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0209672183365 0.0667264976115 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 14.1392134831 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 48.8420337079 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.1743820225 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.1639044944 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.2 8.38706741573 110% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 100.480337079 114% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.