In business, education, and government, it is always appropriate to remain skeptical of
new leaders until those leaders show that they are worthy of trust.
Leaders, such as teachers or managers, have a substantial role in their agency, isntitute or company. They must guide people and show to deserve their trust. In this sense, skepticism toward leaders is a crucial way to analyze them and choose if it is correct to trust them as required. However, some circumstances have to be considered, like past experiences.
A biased opinion on a leader can mislead and ruin any chance of trust or of healthy collaboration. Hence, it is fundamental to construe in the best possible way any past experience of the new leader: curricula do exist for this specifical reason, so that companies and agencies, just as educational structures and goverments, can somewhat corroborate their idea of the leader they are going to hire. By this point of view, the eventual skepticism toward a new leader is to be deemed shrewd and productive if past experiences do not furnish momentous info about the new leader himself. Thus, a fledgeling and inexperienced leading figure's ability must be wisely questioned until he or she proves to be effectively trustworthy.
Nontheless, someone's past can delineate an immaterial presentation of the new leader, thus preventing a true and honest assessment of his leading skills. For instance, consider a curriculum that has not been written in a truly aboveboard way, exagerating abilities and past achievement as to engender a better impression on the others. In this circumstances, it is incontrovertible that remaining skeptical would protect from false and treacherous leaders who, in all effects, should not be deeply trusted. On the other hand, consider a really weak curriculum. If people only judged a leader by means of his or her not arresting curricula, they would have no chances to prove that, for any reasons, they can really achieve pivotal goals and, in fact, truly have crucial leading skills that they just had no occasions to show. Aligning to these example, we must agree with the author that being skeptical helps to find out the real nature of a leader.
On the other side, though, there is a concrete counter effect of heavy skepticism. For leaders, it is vital to be trusted by the peope they guide, be they students, emplyees or citizens of a nation. It is clearly evident that a leader whose authority and skills are constantly questioned has cannot completely lead his or her people, jsut as, for instance, a teacher cannot deal with students who follow lessons with askance. In fact, remaining skeptical with a leader is positive and to be praised as far as it is done wisely. Namely, if people always suspect an incapacity in their leaders with a certain degree of hostility, they automatically prevent the leaders from expressing themselves.
In conclusion, skepticism is a canning mean to study a leader and decide if he or she is worth of trust. This is particularly true in the case of dishonest curricula and unexperienced leaders. Notwithstanding this, it is important not to forget that trust is a crucial aspect of the relationship between leaders and leaded, and being over-skeptical could ruin everything and dramatically hinder leader's actions.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 344, Rule ID: PAST_EXPERIENCE_MEMORY[1]
Message: Use simply 'experiences'.
Suggestion: experiences
...rcumstances have to be considered, like past experiences. A biased opinion on a leader can mi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 166, Rule ID: PAST_EXPERIENCE_MEMORY[1]
Message: Use simply 'experience'.
Suggestion: experience
...o construe in the best possible way any past experience of the new leader: curricula do exist f...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 509, Rule ID: PAST_EXPERIENCE_MEMORY[1]
Message: Use simply 'experiences'.
Suggestion: experiences
...s to be deemed shrewd and productive if past experiences do not furnish momentous info about the...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 340, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...r a better impression on the others. In this circumstances, it is incontrovertible t...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, however, if, really, so, thus, as to, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 28.0 19.5258426966 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 26.0 14.8657303371 175% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 48.0 33.0505617978 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 69.0 58.6224719101 118% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2649.0 2235.4752809 118% => OK
No of words: 520.0 442.535393258 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09423076923 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.77530192783 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01145188499 2.79657885939 108% => OK
Unique words: 276.0 215.323595506 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.530769230769 0.4932671777 108% => OK
syllable_count: 821.7 704.065955056 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 6.24550561798 176% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.38483146067 228% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.7782772742 60.3974514979 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.409090909 118.986275619 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6363636364 23.4991977007 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.95454545455 5.21951772744 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 10.2758426966 165% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.290383849245 0.243740707755 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0873413171762 0.0831039109588 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0657093203975 0.0758088955206 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176563479375 0.150359130593 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0223136565884 0.0667264976115 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 14.1392134831 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 48.8420337079 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 12.1639044944 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.91 8.38706741573 106% => OK
difficult_words: 136.0 100.480337079 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.