Children should not be forced by law to be educated by either public schools or home schooling if their parents do not wish them to be Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take In d

Essay topics:

Children should not be forced by law to be educated by either public schools or home schooling if their parents do not wish them to be.
Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider the possible consequences of implementing the policy and explain how these consequences shape your position.

It is often argued that the education of children, in schools or at home, should not be mandatory by law and that parents should take this decision for their children. Even if this claim could seem reasonable at first glance, many drawbacks would occur in its implementation and in many situations the rights of the children would not be respected.

First, the education provided in the schools is not all about teaching children a huge amount of theorical notions in order to make their culture wider. Rather it is much more something that concerns their personal growth. In fact, when pupils start going to school they get automatically involved in an environment that is totally different from the one they are used to frequent, that is the familiar one. This situation help them to develop one of the most important abilities they will learn in all their life: the ability of adapting themselves to a new situation. For this reason, schools and education in general should be promoted not only beacuse the professional growth they provide, but especially for the personal one.

In addition, implementing this policy could mean putting in danger the future of many children. As a matter of fact, especially in the developing countries, this policy would have as main result that children would be forced to work for their family business and to abandon their education. As a consequence, these poor children would lose forever the chance to decide what they want to do in their life, since, without studying, they would be forced to do the same work for all their existence. Of course it can be argued that many of them would love to help their family by working for them but, anyway, doing this, they will lose permanently their chance to have a free will.

On the other side of the argument, many people could believe that since, generally speaking, parents are mature and wise, they should be able to understand which is the best choice for their children. Of course this claim can be true in most of the globalized countries, but since this policy concerns the whole world, a more complex reasoning should be done. In fact, removing the mandatory education would put many children in danger. Therefore, the drawbacks overweight the benefits and, thus, it would be better not to implement this policy at least in the developing countries.

In conclusion, people who are strongly convinced that the obligation of education for children should be removed, are not completely wrong in their reasoning. However, even if some people would benefit from its implementation, the majority would just see its drawbacks. Firstly, going to school is important not just for the theorical education that is provided, but to make children understand the rules of living in a society and of adapting themselves in a situation way different from their usual one. In addition, many children from the least developed countries will lose forever the opportunity to have an education since the would be forced by their family to work since the youngest ages.

Votes
Average: 6.6 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 154, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Rather,
...s in order to make their culture wider. Rather it is much more something that concerns...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 365, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[5]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'used to frequenting'.
Suggestion: used to frequenting
...totally different from the one they are used to frequent, that is the familiar one. This situati...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
anyway, but, first, firstly, however, if, so, therefore, thus, at least, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, in general, of course, as a matter of fact

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 19.5258426966 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 27.0 12.4196629213 217% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 55.0 33.0505617978 166% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 72.0 58.6224719101 123% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 12.9106741573 163% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2544.0 2235.4752809 114% => OK
No of words: 512.0 442.535393258 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96875 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.75682846001 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63687788872 2.79657885939 94% => OK
Unique words: 225.0 215.323595506 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.439453125 0.4932671777 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 775.8 704.065955056 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.38483146067 228% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.9981639755 60.3974514979 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.894736842 118.986275619 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.9473684211 23.4991977007 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 5.21951772744 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.305134456459 0.243740707755 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115402941361 0.0831039109588 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.081683367035 0.0758088955206 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.204353005023 0.150359130593 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.03933164052 0.0667264976115 59% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 14.1392134831 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 48.8420337079 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.1639044944 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.89 8.38706741573 94% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 100.480337079 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.