Claim In any field business politics education government those in power should step down after five years Reason The surest path to success for any enterprise is revitalization through new leadership Write a response in which you discuss the
Throughout the world, power and management have never ceased to draw public attention and provoke debates. Many people believe that leaders in any field should withdraw their position after five years, the issue as to whether selecting new leading person is the best way to keep an organization succeed or not remains controversial. To the best of my knowledge, I disagree with neither leaders should resign after five years nor the path to success of any company is appointing new chief.
First, it is important to recognise that the role of leaders is managing organizations and keeping them stable. Many people may argue that leaders tend to take advantage of power for their own benefit over time. This argument could be true to some extent. However, they should take into account that the fact that leaders are not only managers but also visionary individuals. Suppose, for example, Jeff Bezos is the founder of Amazon, he has started his journey more than twenty years ago and evolved Amazon with a clear vision to become a billion dollar company. If leaders have to resign from their positions after five years, they are unlikely to achieve milestones in their plans.
Second, it is equally important to recognise that “Rome was not built in a day”, it means success does not come overnight. Therefore, new elected leaders need time to get familiar with the convoluted structure of organizations. If they have only a five-year period, the limited amount of time could negatively affect their decision. As a result, leading term should not be fixed to a constant period and leaders might have sufficient time to accomplish their strategy. For instance, President Franklin D. Roosevelt was the only U.S president elected in four consecutive terms, he served the longest presidency, over twelve years, before dying early in his fourth term; he implemented New Deal and led the United States overcome the Great Depression.
Finally, many people support the idea that re-electing new chairman continuously is the most certain way to success. However, they are ignorant of the fact that leadership position is not suitable for everyone and only those who have the capability and courage can take the responsibility to lead. Therefore, leaders must be people who are appropriate to organizations and from that they can direct the business to the road of success. A telling example is Steve Jobs, co-founder of Apple, he was fired by his own company and was appointed to the CEO position after several years; when he came back, Apple was nearly bankrupt and under his leadership in more than twenty years, Apple now is one of the most innovative and successful tech companies.
In conclusion, it is not reasonable that people in power should step down after five years nor the road to success of organizations is changing their leader constantly. The living examples of Jeff Bezos, Franklin D. Roosevelt and Steve Jobs bear this out. They all had long time in leadership positions and attained remarkable results.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 213, Rule ID: WHETHER[6]
Message: Can you shorten this phrase to just 'whether', or rephrase the sentence to avoid "as to"?
Suggestion: whether
...ir position after five years, the issue as to whether selecting new leading person is the bes...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 541, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: S
...nt Franklin D. Roosevelt was the only U.S president elected in four consecutive t...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, if, may, second, so, therefore, as to, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 19.5258426966 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 33.0505617978 127% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 62.0 58.6224719101 106% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2538.0 2235.4752809 114% => OK
No of words: 499.0 442.535393258 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08617234469 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.72634191566 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68662071229 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 263.0 215.323595506 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.527054108216 0.4932671777 107% => OK
syllable_count: 787.5 704.065955056 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 6.24550561798 224% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.345090832 60.3974514979 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.347826087 118.986275619 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6956521739 23.4991977007 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5652173913 5.21951772744 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 10.2758426966 156% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.186206426157 0.243740707755 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.050292006722 0.0831039109588 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0558492168388 0.0758088955206 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117313041511 0.150359130593 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0577937789046 0.0667264976115 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 14.1392134831 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 12.1639044944 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 119.0 100.480337079 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.