It is important for all cities and towns to have large outdoor public spaces, such as parks or squares. Do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
Many people claim that big public places should be built in all towns and cities. While it is true that these places can be beneficial to some extent, I would argue that they should not be available in all cities and towns.
To begin with, there are several advantages of public spaces. Firstly, since towns and cities have great number of modern buildings such as skyscrapers or multi functional buildings, public spaces could reduce the monotonous atmosphere of urban areas. For example, in New York, there is Central Park which is constructed in the centre of the city and surrounded by other tall buildings. This could positively affect the uniqueness of cityscape. Secondly, because people usually work or study in narrow spaces such as offices or classrooms every day, public areas could provide them with open spaces to relax or take part in public events. For instance, citizens of Ho Chi Minh city usually celebrate the beginning of new year in Nguyen Hue Walking Street.
However, I do not think all towns and cities should have public areas. First, since there are many cities such as Hanoi or Da Nang facing overpopulation issue ,authorities should prioritize constructing more accommodations for people. For example, in Ho Chi Minh city, there are a great number of apartment buildings constructed to serve the high demand of young individuals. Additionally, because annual budget of each city is different, towns and cities that have tight budget should focus on important sectors. For instance, the government could spend money on building hospitals or schools before planning to erect parks or squares. This could improve people’s quality of life and avoid financial burden.
In conclusion, while it is true that large public spaces could have some advantages to towns and cities, I believe not all cities and towns should have these kinds of places.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 159, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...i or Da Nang facing overpopulation issue ,authorities should prioritize constructi...
^^
Line 5, column 298, Rule ID: A_GREAT_NUMBER_OF_NN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'apartments'?
Suggestion: apartments
... Minh city, there are a great number of apartment buildings constructed to serve the high...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, it is true, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1574.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 307.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12703583062 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63317930421 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.560260586319 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 477.0 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.2821258147 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.933333333 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4666666667 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.93333333333 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.336758806068 0.244688304435 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110859045148 0.084324248473 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0677818330434 0.0667982634062 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.199181369852 0.151304729494 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0610553893371 0.056905535591 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.