More big shopping malls are being built and they replace small shops. Is this a positive or negative development?
Currently a great number of big shopping centres are being constructed and they replace small shops. While this trend can be negative to some extent, I would argue that it is more positive.
On the one hand, big shopping malls have some drawbacks. Firstly, due to high operating cost such as salary of large number of employees or repairs and maintenance fees, products sold in big malls are more expensive than other places. Therefore, people have to pay much money for an item. If people buy goods in small shops, they might save their money. Secondly, because shopping malls are large and have a significant number of people, they have to spend much time on shopping. For example, buyers usually wait for checkout in long line at the weekend. If people go to small shops, they could buy items quickly.
On the other hand, I believe there are some benefits of this development. First, since big shopping centres have a significant number of goods of many manufacturers, people have a wider range of choices. As a result, they could compare different brands and products. For instance, buyers could easily compare the shoes of Converse and Vans while it is difficult to do that at small shops. Additionally, because large malls have various entertainment facilities such as cinema halls or children’s play zones, people not only can go shopping but also have fun. For example, couples might watch movies at the cinema and buy foods afterwards at shopping centres. This could positively affect their experiences.
In conclusion, while this tendency can have several disadvantages, I believe that its advantages are greater.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 41.998997996 64% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1368.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 270.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06666666667 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70107431759 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.555555555556 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 415.8 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 2.10420841683 380% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.0428741355 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.4705882353 106.682146367 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.8823529412 20.7667163134 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.94117647059 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.315317200726 0.244688304435 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102501488506 0.084324248473 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0867770603693 0.0667982634062 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.207758213116 0.151304729494 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.136313267869 0.056905535591 240% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.0946893788 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 50.2224549098 129% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 11.3001002004 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.83 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.83 8.58950901804 91% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 78.4519038076 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.