Throughout the world, disgraceful events have never ceased to draw public attention and provoke debates. Although there are numerous people believe that scandals should not be happened, others think those shameful incidents might spark controversies but might lead to change our ways of thinking and action. In my opinion, progressives could take advantage of those shameful incidents and pave the way for future reforms.
The Watergate scandal was a major federal political scandal in the United States involving the administration of President Richard Nixon from 1972 to 1974. The term Watergate has come to some illegal activities undertaken by members of the Nixon administration such as wiretapping political opponents or the harassment of activist groups. After the incident, rather than face impeachment, Richard Nixon resigned in 1974 and threaten to destroy the tapes. At the time, presidential records were still legally considered a president’s private property and Richard Nixon had the right to keep those tapes. As a stopgap measure, Congress passed the Presidential Recordings and Materials Preservation Act of 1974 to seize Nixon records pertaining to Watergate and government abuse and preserve them in National Archives.
On November 22, 1963, the world was shocked by the assasination of President John F. Kennedy. After hearing three gunshots, people in Dallas, Texas, saw Kennedy slumped in the backseat of his vehicle, which quickly accelerated to get to the nearest hospital; unfortunately, the President died before getting to the hospital. Then Vice President Lyndon B. Johnson was sworn in as the new President of the United States. The sorrowful event traumatized the nation and led a united Congress to make a constitutional change. By 1963, Congress was debating an attempt to amend the Constitution to clear up all the succession matters and add a procedure for dealing with a leader who became unable to perform office’s duty temporarily or permanently. With Kennedy’s unexpected death, the need for a clear way to determine presidential succession forced Congress to make the 25th amendment.
In conclusion, taking all the above-mentioned facts, it is reasonable to think that scandals would affect citizens’ life due to their advantages.
- The following appeared as part of an article in a business magazine A recent study rating 300 male and female Mentian advertising executives according to the average number of hours they sleep per night showed an association between the amount of sleep th 90
- Woven baskets characterized by a particular distinctive pattern have previously been found only in the immediate vicinity of the prehistoric village of Palea and therefore were believed to have been made only by the Palean people. Recently, however, archa 63
- Because people increasingly eat at restaurant, all restaurants should be required to display nutritional information about the meals they serve. This knowledge makes it easier for diners to make healthy choices and reduces the risk of diet related health 50
- Claim: Governments must ensure that their major cities receive the financial support they need in order to thrive.Reason: It is primarily in cities that a nation's cultural traditions are preserved and generated. 79
- Nowadays, more and more people want to travel to remote areas such as the South Pole. Do the advantages of this type of travel outweigh the disadvantages? 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, still, then, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 19.5258426966 41% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.3162921348 35% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 33.0505617978 33% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 58.6224719101 85% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1951.0 2235.4752809 87% => OK
No of words: 351.0 442.535393258 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.5584045584 5.05705443957 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32839392791 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14766210426 2.79657885939 113% => OK
Unique words: 223.0 215.323595506 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.635327635328 0.4932671777 129% => OK
syllable_count: 596.7 704.065955056 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 6.24550561798 16% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.38483146067 205% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.3573978991 60.3974514979 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.9375 118.986275619 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9375 23.4991977007 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.9375 5.21951772744 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 10.2758426966 29% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 5.13820224719 234% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0664831094936 0.243740707755 27% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0187358792897 0.0831039109588 23% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0219985467034 0.0758088955206 29% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0389702957073 0.150359130593 26% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.026847106199 0.0667264976115 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
automated_readability_index: 15.7 14.1392134831 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 48.8420337079 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.97 12.1639044944 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.72 8.38706741573 116% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 100.480337079 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 16.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 6
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.