Nowadays, more and more people want to travel to remote areas such as the South Pole. Do the advantages of this type of travel outweigh the disadvantages?
Currently a great number of people are going to travel to isolated places such as the south pole. While this trend has several advantages to some extent, I would argue that is has more disadvantages.
On the one hand, visiting remote areas has some benefits. Firstly, since famous cities and countries in the world such as Venice or Paris are too common and overcrowded, travelling to isolated places is far more interesting. For example, a trip to the South Pole could give tourists a chance to explore this place and see rare animals like penguins. This could allow them to have valuable experiences and unforgettable memories. Secondly, due to a significant number of undiscovered mysteries that are useful, scientists might acquire more knowledge about environmental habitat. For instance, when coming to the North Pole, researchers could study about life of polar bears which live far away from humans. This might help to learn how to protect animals in these areas.
On the other hand, I believe there are some drawbacks of this development. First, because these locations are usually isolated and far from human living areas, it could be risky for travellers who do not prepare sufficiently. For example, people have to face the risk of being attacked by wild animals such as anaconda or piranha when travelling to Amazon rainforest. Additionally, since visiting isolated places often requires a huge amount of investment in researching and ensuring safety of travellers, the cost of travelling tend to be high. For instance, a trip to Antarctica might cost a huge amount of money per person. Therefore, only scientists and rich people could afford this activity so this development is likely to benefit only a small group of individuals.
In conclusion, while visiting remote areas can have several advantages, I believe that its disadvantages are greater.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1571.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 303.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18481848185 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86414650201 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587458745875 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 508.5 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.6501620051 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.1875 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9375 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06120827912 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.286140110765 0.244688304435 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.084027445684 0.084324248473 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.058130810524 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183378590308 0.151304729494 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0775495354197 0.056905535591 136% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.7 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.