Sending criminals to prison is not the effective method to deal with them. Education and job training should be used instead. To what extend do you agree or disagree?
Many people claim that governments should only support their local citizens instead of helping residents in other countries. While it is true that the government need to focus on their own people, I believe it is also possible to provide support for others around the world.
To begin with, there are some reasons why governments should help people in their own nations. Firstly, because of an increasing number of homeless people in local communities such as people who do not have their own houses live under bridges or metro stations, authorities should prioritise to help those who are impoverished and cannot afford shelters. For example, the government could provide public houses and free food. Secondly, due to transitional economy, the unemployment rate has increased dramatically. For instance, in Vietnam, the labour-intensive economy has been developing to knowledge-based economy that required a numerous of educated employees. Therefore, authorities should take care of unemployment seriously. For example, governments could provide job training for unemployed individuals. this could help to reduce the number of jobless people.
However, I would argue that we can also support individuals coming from other parts of the world. First, because there are a great number of undeveloped countries where citizens live in a poor standard of living such as Haiti or Ethiopia, governments of developed nations need to support these poorer countries. this might help them overcome difficult situations. For example, when people in African countries are dying from curable diseases, richer countries could donate medicines and provide medical support. Additionally, diplomacy plays an essential role in the growth of economy. For instance, Japan usually provide ODA for many developing countries. this could improve diplomatic relations between nations and ensure the sustainable development of countries.
In conclusion, it is true that governments could support their citizens, I believe it is also possible to help people in the world.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Many
many people claim that governments should on...
^^^^
Line 6, column 632, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...o knowledge-based economy that required a large number of educated employees. Therefore, authorit...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 817, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...ob training for unemployed individuals. this could help to reduce the number of jobl...
^^^^
Line 11, column 313, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...need to support these poorer countries. this might help them overcome difficult situ...
^^^^
Line 11, column 658, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...vide ODA for many developing countries. this could improve diplomatic relations betw...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, it is true, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1770.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 311.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.69131832797 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19942759058 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9606064581 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.549839228296 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 537.3 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 54.2362516003 49.4020404114 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.3333333333 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2777777778 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.38888888889 7.06120827912 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.053960357703 0.244688304435 22% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0194161338352 0.084324248473 23% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0260252238129 0.0667982634062 39% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0299944827979 0.151304729494 20% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0286549882236 0.056905535591 50% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.43 12.4159519038 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.9 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.