The world evolves with great ideas and these great ideas are manifested by some formidable leaders who aspire to lead a group of people and mold the characteristics of their organization in a fruitful way. There have been many revolutionary leaders who came and contended for the radical beliefs that they had pursued. Change is very important but the change of thinking should evolve with time, the change of these radical leaders should not be changed in every five years.
In divergent fields such as politics, business or government, it is the leader who holds the most prominent role in shaping the organization. The leaders come with the ingenuity to do something radical and therefore, they work sedulously to achieve there aim. It is not sagacious to think that in just five years their role becomes obsolete and a new leader should be brought in power. For example, India being a democratic country gives the freedom to its citizen to enfranchise and choose the best candidate to lead their country. Before, 2014, Dr. Manmohan Singh was the prime minister of India for 10 years with the choice of the citizens of his country. He brought many inspiring and pioneering technological advancements and has led the country judiciously for 10 years. His experience and discerning skills made him one of the inspiring leaders.
Most of the prodigious organization working today was at first a small idea that came into the mind of the inventor of that colossal organization. These tycoon companies need attention and work of so many years. For example, Ratan Tata, the industrialist, and director of Tata group have worked painstakingly for years to ensure the flourishment of his company. Being a leader he directed a number of people to work diligently with him for a common purpose and has made a successful empire today disseminated in divergent parts of the world. In just five years, it would have not been possible for him to bring such revolutionary changes and ultimately, fulfill every aim that he had wished for.
Change is the most important thing today. From the beliefs of society to advancements of technology everything is evolving. This change indubitably brings revival to our world. However, there are some in power who exploit their power for their personal achievements. These plutocrats should be taken down for sure. There should be a proper check on them and in such a scenario, changing the man in power is the best option. It brings a sense of responsibility and fear of being answerable to its subordinates and hence, lessens the percentage of venality and improbity. Also, there are some leaders with dogmatic thinking who do not advocate change and just want everything to go with conventional rules. In such cases also, it becomes significant to bring change and bring pioneering ideas into life.
Therefore, leadership ensures working for the betterment of others and guiding the progeny to a better path of life. Such leaders should always be given redoubtable homage and their presence should be as long as it can be. It will be an encouragement for others to be such proficient persons and aspire to bring such radical changes.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 188, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a fruitful way" with adverb for "fruitful"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...e characteristics of their organization in a fruitful way. There have been many revolutionary lea...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, however, if, so, therefore, for example, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 19.5258426966 128% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 24.0 14.8657303371 161% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 33.0505617978 115% => OK
Preposition: 67.0 58.6224719101 114% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2641.0 2235.4752809 118% => OK
No of words: 529.0 442.535393258 120% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99243856333 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.79583152331 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82629748032 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 250.0 215.323595506 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.47258979206 0.4932671777 96% => OK
syllable_count: 828.9 704.065955056 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 6.24550561798 192% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 20.2370786517 133% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.0066295234 60.3974514979 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.8148148148 118.986275619 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5925925926 23.4991977007 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.7037037037 5.21951772744 52% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 10.2758426966 156% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.120390103804 0.243740707755 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0362641534056 0.0831039109588 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0360689370811 0.0758088955206 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0730415178566 0.150359130593 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.013402003981 0.0667264976115 20% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 14.1392134831 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.8420337079 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 12.1639044944 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.19 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 121.0 100.480337079 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.