Claim: Any piece of information referred to as a fact should be mistrusted, since it may well be proven false in the future.Reason: Much of the information that people assume is factual actually turns out to be inaccurate.Write a response in which you dis

Essay topics:

Claim: Any piece of information referred to as a fact should be mistrusted, since it may well be proven false in the future.

Reason: Much of the information that people assume is factual actually turns out to be inaccurate.

Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which that claim is based.

Fact is something which is true and its correctness can be generally experimentally proven. However, with each day as we progress even more in the field of science and technology, new theories are coming up which disprove the previous theories. Thereby, reestablishing the notion of facts. Thus, having a mistrust on facts may be right to a great extent.

Oxygen is necessary for the surivial of human beings and animals. This is fact which is well perceived by everyone and even scientifically acknowledged. It may seem that this fact will never change, however, there definitely lies a possibility in which due to some calamity the entire earth's atmosphere is destroyed and entire human existence may be wiped off. However, due to biological evolution, there very well lies a possibility that due to mutation, organisms might develop a new method of respiration which frees the dependence on oxygen for survival.

In addition, as per Einstien's theory of relativity, it is stated that no particle can travel beyond the speed of light, as beyond this particular speed particles tend to loose their mass and they become non-existent. On the contrary, recent scientific discoveries disprove this fact. In one of the world's most expensive equipment, The Large Hadron Collider, few particles were found which were travelling in speeds greater than that of light. Thus, the fact that no particle can travel beyond the speed of light, which was thought universally true, nevertheless was disproved.

However, this does not in any way mean that we should have absolute mistrust on the facts that are established today. Today, sun is at the centre of the solar system, this is fact which is very much true, and even though there lies a possibility that this might change in the next thousand years or so, does not give us a reason to mistrust it. By the time this happens, most of the people wont be alive to witness it. Thus, discarding a fact with a possibility of being disproved a million or billion years later is also wrong, because during our entire span of survival this fact is true.

Hence, even though there are numerous facts in which scientific theories have been discarded, encourages us to place a mistrust on the facts. However, again at the same time it does not justify mistrusting the facts which are true during our lifetime.

Votes
Average: 7 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 286, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'earths'' or 'earth's'?
Suggestion: earths'; earth's
...n which due to some calamity the entire earths atmosphere is destroyed and entire huma...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 171, Rule ID: LOOSE_LOSE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'lose' (= miss, waste, suffer the loss etc.)?
Suggestion: lose
...this particular speed particles tend to loose their mass and they become non-existent...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 495, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a billion'.
Suggestion: a billion
...ibility of being disproved a million or billion years later is also wrong, because duri...
^^^^^^^

Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'hence', 'however', 'if', 'may', 'nevertheless', 'so', 'thus', 'well', 'in addition', 'on the contrary', 'to a great extent']

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.204081632653 0.240241500013 85% => OK
Verbs: 0.160997732426 0.157235817809 102% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0816326530612 0.0880659088768 93% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0770975056689 0.0497285424764 155% => OK
Pronouns: 0.031746031746 0.0444667217837 71% => OK
Prepositions: 0.120181405896 0.12292977631 98% => OK
Participles: 0.0430839002268 0.0406280797675 106% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.73987093329 2.79330140395 98% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0181405895692 0.030933414821 59% => OK
Particles: 0.00453514739229 0.0016655270985 272% => OK
Determiners: 0.106575963719 0.0997080785238 107% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0226757369615 0.0249443105267 91% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0272108843537 0.0148568991511 183% => OK

Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2345.0 2732.02544248 86% => OK
No of words: 394.0 452.878318584 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.95177664975 6.0361032391 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45527027702 4.58838876751 97% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.335025380711 0.366273622748 91% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.230964467005 0.280924506359 82% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.197969543147 0.200843997647 99% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.129441624365 0.132149295362 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73987093329 2.79330140395 98% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 219.290929204 93% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.517766497462 0.48968727796 106% => OK
Word variations: 57.19791149 55.4138127331 103% => OK
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6194690265 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.8888888889 23.380412469 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.5027039668 59.4972553346 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.277777778 141.124799967 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8888888889 23.380412469 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.666666666667 0.674092028746 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.21349557522 58% => OK
Readability: 44.9853355894 51.4728631049 87% => OK
Elegance: 1.36134453782 1.64882698954 83% => OK

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.377321413644 0.391690518653 96% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.087898308826 0.123202303941 71% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0643025445184 0.077325440228 83% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.534279235766 0.547984918172 97% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.146577272396 0.149214159877 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.144630605991 0.161403998019 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0502479719228 0.0892212321368 56% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.299518648 0.385218514788 78% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0433707239279 0.0692045440612 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.239039852083 0.275328986314 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0584871098644 0.0653680567796 89% => OK

Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.4325221239 96% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.30420353982 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88274336283 82% => OK
Positive topic words: 6.0 7.22455752212 83% => OK
Negative topic words: 3.0 3.66592920354 82% => OK
Neutral topic words: 1.0 2.70907079646 37% => OK
Total topic words: 10.0 13.5995575221 74% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

---------------------
Rates: 70.83 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.