Claim: Any piece of information referred to as a fact should be mistrusted, since it may well be proven false in the future.
Reason: Much of the information that people assume is factual actually turns out to be inaccurate.
Since, in modern age of technology, rife of information surplus in our quotidian life, and information once posit as factual turn out be fallacy. In particular, newton law of gravitational, which state that force between two object is due to its mass, which is attractive in nature. Even though, it should not be miss trusted because it laid cornerstone for development of illustrious theory of physics like quantam physics, ralativity ect. Even all the information posit as fact once turn out to be erroneous; augment the knowledge and follow the path of evolution to feted for truth in future. Hence, those fallacy of information should be sollowed with pinch of salt for prevailing time.
As such Newton law of gravity widely palatable as gospel of physics. It posit that two object attract each other because of it's mases, theory hold for many centuries until Enisten come with relativity theory of gravity , which stated that two object actually doesn't attract each other, since masses compress the time-space around it- Einisten assume that whole universe is composed of sapace and time, which is interchangeable, can be compressed and plastic in nature. But question is how such eminent scientist newton went wrong. Moreover, answer is newton assume that space is one dimensional, rigid and constant, and so time. However, Newton theory of gravity is still remarkable development in field of physics, which is first step to construe
gravity we experience. Even though, it is untrue: it set cornerstone for understanding the uncanny nature of gravity.
And hence, to promulgate that posit information as true , found to be apocryphal latter should be untrusted would be fanatical rather than treat it with pinch of salt would more veracious way to decipher it which eventually open the path for more revolutionary ideas and benefit to humankind to by augmenting the knowledge and also keep refining it.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 226, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'object' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'objects'.
Suggestion: objects
...nal, which state that force between two object is due to its mass, which is attractive...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 306, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...active in nature. Even though, it should not be miss trusted because it laid corn...
^^
Line 1, column 587, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...he path of evolution to feted for truth in future. Hence, those fallacy of information sh...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 605, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this fallacy' or 'those fallacies'?
Suggestion: this fallacy; those fallacies
...on to feted for truth in future. Hence, those fallacy of information should be sollowed with...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 652, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...allacy of information should be sollowed with pinch of salt for prevailing time. ...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...h pinch of salt for prevailing time. As such Newton law of gravity widely palat...
^^
Line 3, column 73, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'posits'?
Suggestion: posits
...dely palatable as gospel of physics. It posit that two object attract each other beca...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 128, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...object attract each other because of its mases, theory hold for many centuries un...
^^
Line 3, column 212, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...l Enisten come with relativity theory of gravity , which stated that two object a...
^^
Line 3, column 221, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... come with relativity theory of gravity , which stated that two object actually d...
^^
Line 3, column 262, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
..., which stated that two object actually doesnt attract each other, since masses compr...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 294, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ctually doesnt attract each other, since masses compress the time-space around it...
^^
Line 3, column 699, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... gravity is still remarkable development in field of physics, which is first step...
^^
Line 3, column 753, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...physics, which is first step to construe gravity we experience. Even though, it i...
^^^^
Line 4, column 88, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ue: it set cornerstone for understanding the uncanny nature of gravity. And he...
^^
Line 6, column 56, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...romulgate that posit information as true , found to be apocryphal latter should be...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, hence, however, if, moreover, so, still, in particular
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 33.0505617978 61% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 58.6224719101 75% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1607.0 2235.4752809 72% => OK
No of words: 310.0 442.535393258 70% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18387096774 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.55969084622 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82109369019 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 215.323595506 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.567741935484 0.4932671777 115% => OK
syllable_count: 507.6 704.065955056 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 20.2370786517 59% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 102.476115103 60.3974514979 170% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.916666667 118.986275619 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.8333333333 23.4991977007 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.83333333333 5.21951772744 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 16.0 7.80617977528 205% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.219808075393 0.243740707755 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0794882958765 0.0831039109588 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0863767095964 0.0758088955206 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123020351207 0.150359130593 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.103807157645 0.0667264976115 156% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 14.1392134831 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 48.8420337079 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 12.1743820225 107% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.06 12.1639044944 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.21 8.38706741573 110% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 100.480337079 85% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.8971910112 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.