The following appeared as a memorandum from the Human Resources director at Dexter Gorman Instruments, a company that manufactures saxophones.
"On this year's survey about work habits, our employees tended to strongly agree with the idea that if they took less time to complete their assigned work, the quality of their work would suffer. However, we recently conducted an internal study that proves this idea wrong. Managers across several divisions identified an overtime group: the employees who worked an average of 48 or more hours per week over the past year instead of the expected 40 hours per week. We then looked at the number of documented work errors produced by all of our employees during the past year and found that the overtime group was responsible for significantly more work errors overall than their fellow employees. On the basis of these findings, our recommendation to the company president is to require employees at Dexter Gorman Instruments to complete their work during the regular 40-hour work week and allow overtime only for urgent circumstances."
Write a response in which you discuss what questions would need to be answered in order to decide whether the recommendation and the argument on which it is based are reasonable. Be sure to explain how the answers to these questions would help to evaluate the recommendation.
Since, argument and recommendation posit that work time should reduced to 40 hour per week, only allowed over time if it is emergency. It is not only riddle with fallacy, but also ambiguous . Moreover, teeming with untenable assumption and wanting testimony. As, there are serval erroneous assumption which flawed the argument and it's reccomendation, like survey done to know about employee habit is vague, Manager delgated to identity about working habit does't give any data used in thier process, where is the statistic analysis or mention any method used for exegesis for error of over time worker.
Muchlike, manger simply refute the survey carried about woker habit that less time lead to bad quality of product, how manger come to such adjudication by simply assayed over the serval division. However, both survery and manager adjucation are serioully flawed and uncanny. if survey is to know the employee habit should perform with larger sample scale, around of 45 percentage employee, it would give clear idea about result. Either to comply it or refute it, but only relyin on bunch of manager serval division woould be fatal.
Similarly, error done by employee which is doing overtime and regurlar employee, it is all but not unequivocal. How both juxtapose, what is method involed to calculate the error is not mention. Insted, method to calculate error should be properl explicated, error made in which part should be mention, What are factor that color the employee to made error should be ferret.
Hence, argument and reccomedation is teeming whith serval untenable and wantin information and assusmption, if reccomendation is implemneted without disabsue it would be deterimental to working condtion of company, and ultimately abysmal to bottom line company profit. Instead, conspicuous exegesis should be as mention above and every survey mention explicatedly.
\
Comments
e-rater score report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 3.5 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 8 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 24 2
No. of Sentences: 12 15
No. of Words: 298 350
No. of Characters: 1539 1500
No. of Different Words: 165 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.155 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.164 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.613 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 125 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 84 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 52 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 30 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 24.833 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 13.704 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.583 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.35 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.591 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.061 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 78, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'hour' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'hours'.
Suggestion: hours
...sit that work time should reduced to 40 hour per week, only allowed over time if it ...
^^^^
Line 1, column 190, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... riddle with fallacy, but also ambiguous . Moreover, teeming with untenable assump...
^^
Line 1, column 291, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'assumptions'?
Suggestion: assumptions
...stimony. As, there are serval erroneous assumption which flawed the argument and its recco...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 451, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'habit the doest'.
Suggestion: habit the doest
...ager delgated to identity about working habit doest give any data used in thier process, wh...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 276, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: If
...ation are serioully flawed and uncanny. if survey is to know the employee habit sh...
^^
Line 3, column 381, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'employee' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'employees'.
Suggestion: employees
...r sample scale, around of 45 percentage employee, it would give clear idea about result....
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 147, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ocal. How both juxtapose, what is method involed to calculate the error is not me...
^^
Line 5, column 295, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'mentioned'?
Suggestion: mentioned
...ted, error made in which part should be mention, What are factor that color the employe...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 368, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'ferreted'?
Suggestion: ferreted
...or the employee to made error should be ferret. Hence, argument and reccomedatio...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, moreover, similarly, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.6327345309 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.9520958084 62% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 11.1786427146 143% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 13.6137724551 51% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 28.8173652695 38% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 55.5748502994 65% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 16.3942115768 116% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1592.0 2260.96107784 70% => OK
No of words: 297.0 441.139720559 67% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.36026936027 5.12650576532 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.56307096286 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73406410723 2.78398813304 98% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 204.123752495 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.569023569024 0.468620217663 121% => OK
syllable_count: 510.3 705.55239521 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59920159681 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.96107784431 60% => OK
Article: 0.0 8.76447105788 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.70958083832 74% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.67365269461 179% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.22255489022 47% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 19.7664670659 66% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 22.8473053892 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 81.2686391911 57.8364921388 141% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.461538462 119.503703932 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8461538462 23.324526521 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.15384615385 5.70786347227 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 5.15768463074 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 9.0 5.25449101796 171% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.20758483034 24% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 6.88822355289 102% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.67664670659 86% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.111780814509 0.218282227539 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0382603644754 0.0743258471296 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0390702587051 0.0701772020484 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0668639230862 0.128457276422 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0354647095787 0.0628817314937 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 14.3799401198 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 48.3550499002 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 12.197005988 107% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.5979740519 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.41 8.32208582834 113% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 98.500998004 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 12.3882235529 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.1389221557 97% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.9071856287 126% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.